My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2008-03-10
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2008
>
AgdaPkt 2008-03-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2009 12:03:28 PM
Creation date
3/6/2008 1:04:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
3/10/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />78 <br /> <br />. Per the Council's request, staff has provided some initial information on the six Page 2 <br />"Budget" category items. . Attachment 4 describes each item, with estimated <br />annual costs, potential funding options, and resource implications. The purpose <br />of these estimates is to provide Council with enough order-of-magnitude <br />information such that a decision can be made to drop or hold the item for now, or <br />direct staff to include a fully developed budget option for Council consideration in <br />the June 2008 budget sessions. Attachments 5 and 6 are provided as <br />background information at this juncture, and may become the basis for <br />subsequent budget option packages when the recommended budget is <br />submitted to the Council. <br /> <br />Staff is specifically seeking direction from Council in the following three areas: <br />1. Accept andlor modify recommended adjustments to the City Council Priorities. <br />At the February 25 session, Council discussed the various youth initiatives that <br />are sponsored by the City and the Council contemplated establishing a priority- <br />solely around these youth initiatives. Staff is seeking clarification if there is. <br />council consensus on establishing such a separate priority or if the Council would <br />prefer to better articulate youth activities initiatives as an initiative under the <br />current priority of Government Operations. (refer to Attachment 3) <br /> <br />2. Identify items which the City Council wants brought back as fully developed <br />budget options within the City Manager's recommended Fiscal Year 2008/09110 <br />budget The Council heard a General Fund Financial Status presentation from <br />the Finance Director and had several questions about the City's projected <br />revenues. Additionally, the Council understands that the staff is currently <br />compiling a "status quo" budget for Council consideration, which will require use <br />of reserves in order to balance revenues and expenditures. Therefore, staff is <br />requesting explicit Council direction on what potential add-on budget options <br />should be included and how the Council wishes the options to be presented. <br />(refer to Attachments 4, 5, and 6) <br /> <br />3. Indicate desired next steps for exploring a "strategic planning process" and <br />linkage to discussion items categorized as "Council deliberation.".. Based on the <br />Council's Feb. 25 discussion, staff believes that some of the items in this <br />category will be further explored over the next several months within the current <br />priority areas and the initiatives, programs, or projects on-going under each. <br />Other items may trigger study sessions, joint meetings with other policy bodies, <br />or follow-up analysiS by staff. <br /> <br />One discussion item - "strategic planning" - stood out, and as the session was <br />wrapping up the facilitator remarked that there seemed to be an appetite to <br />further explore some kind of a strategic planning or community visioning process. <br />Although elements of a strategic plan are built into the priority setting and review <br />process as well as the New General Plan now under way, the Council discussion <br />centered around developing a strategic plan and vision that might then guide <br />these other processes, and/or supersede the current practice of setting priorities. <br />Staff is seeking clarification if the majority of Council would like recommendations <br />on such a process brought back for consideration. (refer to Attachment 2) <br /> <br />The items described above and in the corresponding attachments are the most time- <br />sensitive in nature, due to the budget development and approval timeline. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.