Laserfiche WebLink
<br />8A <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />'Budget Subcommittees' Continued from Page 1... <br /> <br />Senate Subcommittee #4 <br /> <br />The Senate Subcommittee #4 focused primarily on LAO's proposal to "reafign" responsibility for <br />supervising 71,000 parolees with current convictions for non-serious, non-violent drug and property <br />crimes to Iocat probation depart! r leI Its who atready supervise similar offenders. <br /> <br />Past realignment proposals of other programs (mental health} have worked with some success. <br />This LAO proposal however, is victim to the tendency in that office to take money from cities to pay <br />the costs of some other program. In particular, the LAO proposal shifts $178 of Proposition 172 <br />sales tax revenue that now goes to cities to help pay for the program. <br /> <br />The proposal would also shift $188 million from water and waste district property taxes to the <br />program along with $130 million in revenue that now goes to the Department of Motor Vehicles to <br />administer vehicle license fee collections. <br /> <br />Senat~ Mike Machado ~D-linden}, subcommittee chair, pressed the Department of Finance <br />representative about the quality of the Governor's proposal to release 20,000 inmates with non- <br />serious, nonviolent drug and property crimes from state prisons. The LAO realignment proposal is <br />intended to provide probation services to assist the transition ofthese 20,000 inmates into local <br />communities. <br /> <br />The League testified that the LAO proposal has a policy disconnect because it would take money <br />from cities currently dedicated to front-line raw enforcement and public safety programs and give it <br />to counties for probation services. It is highly likely that if 20,000 prisoners are released into local <br />communities, there witt be a significant and direct impact on local law enforcement. <br /> <br />The League- suggested that other revenue sources should be explored instead Witnesses from <br />special districts that provide water and sewer services also voiced their strong opposition to taking <br />property taxes from their jurisdictions and using it to pay for probation services. <br /> <br />Assembly Subcommittee #4 <br /> <br />The Assembly Budget Subcommittee #4 hearing examined the aspects of the LAO proposal aimed <br />at cutting state subventions for rocallaw enforcement programs, including the realtgnment <br />proposal. <br /> <br />The additional programs targeted for cuts by LAO include the Community Oriented Policing <br />Services. (COPS} program that sends $119 million to cities and counties for front-line law <br />enforcement personnel, the juvenile justice program for counties ($119 million) and the booking fee <br />reimbursement for cities to pay county jail booking fees ($38 million). <br /> <br />LAO's proposals to cut city money for all of these programs met heavy opposition from local <br />government. including the local government raw enforcement community. <br /> <br />It was also clear that city officiats had done a good job of contacting members of the subcommittee <br />about the proposals. Most members of the subcommittee expressed serious objections to the <br />funding proposals recommended by the LAO. <br /> <br />'Infrastructure' Continued from Page 1... <br /> <br />David Crane, special advisor to the Governor on jobs and the economy and Dale Bonner, secretary <br />of Business. Transportation and Housing facilitated the meeting with the Governor. <br /> <br />With an opportunity to present its priorities to the Governor, the League made the forrowing <br />recommendations: <br /> <br />j:xpedite Proposition 1 B Money and Authorize Round II of Funding for Cities and Counties. <br />The initial allocation of Prop. 1 B money is just starting to flow to cities, -but future appropriations <br /> <br />2 <br />