My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2020-10-12 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
AgdaPkt 2020-10-12 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2020 12:39:00 PM
Creation date
10/12/2020 11:30:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
10/12/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
506
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
S.A. - Page 20 of 61 <br />Additional community benefits include replacing the existing building that the American Legion Post has <br />occupied for over 70 years with a new structure. The Post could receive a multi -million -dollar endowment <br />to help continue its services and community benefits to veterans and the broader community. The 3,600 <br />square feet proposed event space would help generate additional revenue and allow for the facilities to <br />be rented out for social, business, religious or other functions. <br />Discussion: The current site includes a historic house. The existing historic evaluation for this house <br />associates significance with an important person, the McGarvey family, and while it is not currently <br />designated, the home would be treated as a historic property and the environmental review process, in <br />accordance with CEQA, would identify the impact of demolishing or relocating a historic structures, as <br />well as any applicable mitigation measures required The applicant has not yet identified if this vacant <br />house is to be demolished or relocated. However, Post 105 has committed to honoring Mr. McGarvey in <br />a significant way in the finished project, through facility naming and documentation (plaques, photos, <br />etc.) displayed inside the American Legion Hall. These steps, and any other mitigation measures, would <br />likely be evaluated and explored as potential mitigation measures in the Environmental Impact Report <br />(EIR). Staff recommend further historic evaluation on this historic home as well as consideration/input <br />from the Historic Resources Advisory Committee (HRAC). <br />While the General Plan and Zoning allow for a mixed-use development, the project proposes a higher <br />density (181 dwelling unit (du)/acre) than what is currently allowed under the General Plan (60 du/acre). <br />As such, if the City Council is interested in further studying this project, staff have outlined the below <br />possible options: <br />1. Amendment to Affordable Housing Density Bonus provision in Zoning Ordinance ("Option 1"): The <br />State Density Bonus law indicates that cities must allow a density bonus of up to 35%, but allows <br />cities to exceed this amount. The City's Density Bonus regulations (§32.19) allows a maximum of <br />35% density, consistent with state law. In addition, Assembly Bill No. 1763 (approved) allows <br />projects that are 100% affordable to seek a density bonus of up to 80%. <br />Proceeding under Option 1 would not require a General Plan Amendment, but rather a zoning <br />amendment to the City's Density Bonus regulations. The amendment could allow projects to <br />exceed the maximum bonus allowed if certain criteria were met. These criteria would need to be <br />developed by staff. This provision would be applicable for all future projects that would meet <br />established criteria. <br />• Pros: Option 1 would allow staff to create provisions for allowing a density bonus greater <br />than 35% for projects that meets/exceeds City goals and priorities. Because this <br />mechanism could also be used for all future projects, staff would have to consider criteria <br />in place so it could be used for projects proposing an appropriate amount of level of <br />affordability in said project. Additionally, this option would likely allow for a faster <br />application processing because the review will be project specific. <br />• Considerations: This mechanism will likely not provide the project with the number of <br />units currently proposed. A revised density bonus maximum would likely be between 35% <br />(current max) and 80% (allowable under AB1763 for projects that are 100% affordable). <br />5 <br />City of Redwood City 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA. 94063 Tel: 650-780-7000 www.redwoodcity.org <br />287 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.