My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2020-10-12 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
AgdaPkt 2020-10-12 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2020 12:39:00 PM
Creation date
10/12/2020 11:30:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
10/12/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
506
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4. Caltrain <br />Almost all the above developments cite the closeness to Caltrain as a means of <br />transportation. Before the pandemic Caltrains was having problems meeting the needs <br />of the residents on the peninsula corridor. Caltrains is now struggling to survive with <br />the pandemic (hence the measure on the ballot) so Caltrain is sadly in a precarious <br />position. It is either woefully short of train cars or now woefully short of passengers <br />and funding. Either way this directly impacts the expected builds. <br />• If the Caltrain station were to move further south one would assume shuttles might be <br />added to accommodate the move for people living downtown but I believe one needs to <br />consider if our roads, parking and transportation can handle the additional demands <br />unfortunately all while not understand exactly what the footprint post COVID. <br />5. Zero lot lines in from of all the builds and many are too tall <br />• Almost every neighbor I've talked with don't like the zero lot lines for these very <br />sizable commercial builds. They wish more would be done to lower the profile to at <br />least create the appearance of a less downtown San Jose feel. In addition, they all prefer <br />a lower profile. Most are aghast as the 6-8 story profiles. <br />With the above, I caution a race to readily pass each of the above proposal as I think it barely <br />starts to address the affordable housing issue and there is quite a bit of uncertainty at this time. <br />Once passed, we can't undo what has been done should the environment change. <br />Specifically regarding, the Wells Fargo build. Part of the charm of Redwood City has in been <br />the more open feel, the larger redwood trees, the quirky diagonal streets. Chopping off one of <br />the main streets which adds greenery and character to the downtown will be lost. I urge you to <br />revisit this plan and please rethink the other plans. I feel most are much too tall and too large <br />or the uncertain times we're in and they aren't addressing the underlying needs adequately <br />enough. <br />I'm all for the housing for the veterans. I actually loved this idea at America legion build but <br />would love to see this with a slightly shorter profile (in height). <br />Thank you very much for your time. <br />Best Regards, <br />Janet Lin (and Rob Zehnder) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.