My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2020-10-26 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
AgdaPkt 2020-10-26 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2020 1:04:03 PM
Creation date
10/22/2020 5:08:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
10/26/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
Created:
10/28/2020 3:34 PM
Modified:
10/28/2020 3:34 PM
Text:
mailto:damadfiddler@yahoo.com
ID:
2
Creator:
Created:
10/28/2020 3:34 PM
Modified:
10/28/2020 3:34 PM
Text:
mailto:council@redwoodcity.org
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
878
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
From: Ian A. Walker <br />To: GRP -City Council <br />Subject: Public Comment for Agenda Item 8A - Oct. 26, 2020 <br />Date: Monday, October 26, 2020 6:11:01 PM <br />Good evening, <br />My name is Ian Walker, I'm a resident of Redwood City, and I just celebrated my sixth wedding <br />anniversary last week. <br />As the council knows, we are living in extraordinary times. Life -altering crises are hitting us back-to-back, <br />and in situations like this, there is no such thing as "back to normal;" there is only the path forward. <br />There are three points I want to make regarding this budget and what it means for our path forward. <br />1. First, as someone with nearly a decade of experience in public service, I would like to commend <br />the city for its efforts to minimize layoffs of city employees. But we all know the worst is yet to <br />come, and the impacts of COVID will not be over any time soon. <br />2. That brings me to my second point. This year saw record -shattering fires throughout the bay area, <br />and some parts of the state are still burning as we speak. Estimates show the risk of fire only <br />getting worse in coming years, so it is not only foolish but DANGEROUS to be reducing the city's <br />firefighting capacity. If anything, we should be INCREASING our fire department's resources, as <br />well our programs to help residents deal with the effects of COVID. Looking at the revised budget, <br />I appreciate the fact that the largest portion of the cuts comes from the police department. <br />However, all of that money is from unfilled vacancies; reclaiming that unused money should be an <br />automatic "gimme." Police are the biggest part of the budget, some of the highest-paid employees, <br />and the least useful in dealing with the specific challenges in front of us. Instead of cutting life- <br />saving services like our fire department and other programs that directly serve the public, we <br />should not be afraid to bust open the police piggy bank so that we can protect our other vital <br />services. <br />s. Finally: COVID response. I was HORRIFIED to see the city announce that high-risk enclosed <br />businesses such as gyms, movie theaters, and indoor dining were being reopened, even as <br />experts are already predicting a massive spike in COVID cases over the winter. This creates a <br />danger that reaches far beyond the people who choose to enter these businesses; infection <br />spreads, and the virus isn't going to take a break just because we're tired of it. By rushing into <br />reopening instead of setting up programs to help everyone be able to stay home and isolate <br />responsibly, we are truly sacrificing grandma to save the market. <br />Frustratingly, what we've seen in this crisis is that the city council loves to take credit for things it didn't <br />start, but pass the buck on the things it could actually do itself. Recently, the council congratulated itself <br />on a limited mental health response pilot, which was actually initiated by the county. But when the city <br />was asked to protect renters and homeowners with mortgages from evictions during COVID, the council <br />chose to do nothing and "hope the county would take action." Well, now it's too late; shortly after that <br />discussion, the state past a new law blocking cities from passing new eviction protections. Similarly, the <br />council continues to ignore the recommendations of the policing and equity study THAT IT <br />COMMISSIONED. There's been no reduction in policing, no meaningful oversight, no redirecting of police <br />funds into the programs we actually need. The councilmembers have repeatedly claimed they're just <br />being "slow and careful." But we all know the difference between slow and careful, and deliberately killing <br />action by dragging it out. <br />It is long past time for Redwood City to get serious about climate, about COVID, and about racial injustice <br />and the inherent dangers that police pose to the community. The city council exists to serve the people of <br />Redwood City, and the budget is its truest statement of morals and priorities. What the city council is <br />doing tonight is committing very polite, well-mannered violence against the people of Redwood City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.