My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2020-11-09 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
AgdaPkt 2020-11-09 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2020 8:53:43 AM
Creation date
11/5/2020 6:29:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
11/9/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
Created:
11/5/2020 6:33 PM
Modified:
11/5/2020 6:33 PM
Text:
http://www.redwoodcity.org/
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
883
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.A. - Page 6 of 16 <br />Option 3 <br />Option 3 preserves more recreational space than Option 1 but slightly less recreational space than Option <br />2, as the 1402 Maple Street parcel eastern boundary (straight) line is 200 feet west from the state land <br />property line next to the waterfront. In Option 3, the County would receive 2.4 acres, which would provide <br />space for public serving purposes such as a potential navigation center and transitional housing. This <br />allows the City to utilize approximately 9.5 acres of potential area for future active/passive recreation and <br />open space. <br />Potential Future <br />Recreational <br />'L'ulal Sirrcu Aecn: <br />3 <br />During the study session, the City Council will discuss and provide City staff guidance for potential next <br />steps based on the policy questions below. No formal action will be taken during the study session. Policy <br />Questions for City Council Consideration: <br />• Does the City Council support the concept of a land swap that would support public waterfront <br />access, new open space and initiatives to address the challenges related to homelessness? <br />• Does the City Council support developing plans for future community engagement on park and <br />open space area on public property in the Inner Harbor Area? <br />• If the Council supports both of these, which of the exchange options does the City Council prefer? <br />ANALYSIS <br />Future possibilities for active/passive recreation and open space <br />City staff has retained MIG planning consultants, the same consulting firm that worked on the City's Inner <br />Harbor plan draft, to review the previous draft Inner Harbor Plan and related documents and provide a <br />high level analysis of potential future active/passive recreation and open space options under Option 3, <br />which retains 9.5 acres of City -owned or public property. MIG was also tasked with considering Inner <br />Harbor Task Force guiding principles and community engagement feedback. The potential future <br />possibilities for active/passive recreation and open space were framed to coexist with a navigation center <br />and transitional housing on the 1402 Maple Street parcel. <br />Page 6 of 13 <br />City of Redwood City 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA. 94063 Tel: 650-780-7000 www.redwoodcity.ore <br />146 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.