My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2020-11-09 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
AgdaPkt 2020-11-09 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2020 8:53:43 AM
Creation date
11/5/2020 6:29:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
11/9/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
883
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Lindy Chan, Principal Planner <br />City of Redwood City, Planning Services <br />July 13, 2020 <br />Page 10 <br />along El Camino Real and through the surrounding neighborhoods. These safety issues, in turn, <br />will severely inhibit the District's ability to operate its educational programs. The Project's <br />increase in traffic will also subject students and staff to increased levels of vehicle exhaust, <br />fumes, and other pollution. <br />In order to fully understand these issues, the District requested that the Draft EIR include the <br />following: <br />13. The existing and the anticipated vehicular traffic and student pedestrian <br />movement patterns to and from school sites, including movement patterns to and <br />from Sequoia High School, and including consideration of bus routes. <br />14. The impact(s) of increased vehicular movement and volumes caused by the <br />Project, including but not limited to potential conflicts with school pedestrian <br />movement, school transportation, and busing activities to and from Sequoia High <br />School. <br />15. The estimated travel demand and trip generation, trip distribution and trip <br />assignment by including consideration of school sites and home -to -school travel. <br />16. The cumulative impacts on schools and the community in general resulting from <br />increased vehicular movement and volumes expected from additional <br />development already approved or pending. <br />17. The direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts on the circulation and traffic patterns <br />in the community as a result of traffic generated by the transportation needs of <br />students to and from the Project and schools throughout the District during the <br />Project build -out. <br />18. The impacts on the routes and safety of students traveling to school by vehicle, <br />bus, walking, and bicycles. <br />The Draft EIR fails to analyze a_y of the above categories of information. The Draft EIR does <br />not specifically discuss any vehicular or pedestrian movement patterns to and from Sequoia High <br />School, and how the proposed Project's addition of thousands of daily trips will impact the safety <br />and convenience of those students, families, and staff traveling to and from Sequoia High <br />School. Nor does the Draft EIR analyze how the addition of thousands of new vehicles to El <br />Camino Real and the surrounding streets, which are already severely impacted by traffic, could <br />impact the District's ability to promote its safe routes to school program, and/or comply with <br />Title 5 requirements to locate its school sites within a proposed attendance area that encourages <br />student walking and avoids extensive bussing. (5 Cal. Code Regs. § 14010(1).) In fact, the Draft <br />EIR fails to mention the District and Sequoia High School at all. There is, therefore, no way for <br />the lead agency or the public to assess whether the Project will pose a traffic impact related to the <br />District's provision of public services. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.