My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2020-11-23 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
AgdaPkt 2020-11-23 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2020 5:27:49 PM
Creation date
11/19/2020 6:20:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
11/23/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
840
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.D. - Page 8 of 179 <br />interviews with law enforcement personnel, the Grand Jury concludes that body -worn cameras <br />are a net positive in law enforcement. <br />Local law enforcement officials informed the Grand Jury of the following perceived advantages <br />and disadvantages to the utilization of body -worn cameras by their officers: <br />Advantages of Body -Worn Cameras12 <br />• Reducing complaints: <br />o Police behavior is improved and the use of force is reduced. <br />o Resident behavior is improved. <br />• Providing unedited video evidence of decisions made by officers in <br />high-intensity situations <br />• Increasing transparency and accountability of police officers' activities and improving <br />community perception of law enforcement <br />• Providing valuable evidence in court proceedings and/or in obtaining witness <br />and victim statements <br />Disadvantages of Body -Worn Cameras13 <br />• Officers must manually activate/deactivate the camera in most systems in use today. <br />• Policy development has potential for risk (e.g., privacy issues, chain of custody, <br />and officer activation of camera) due to lack of clarity as to applicable federal and/or <br />state law. <br />• Technology is changing rapidly, which may limit product support after a few years' use. <br />Replacement equipment may be costly. Future local, state, and/or federal legal and policy <br />mandates could add to overall costs. <br />• Increased Public Records Act requests could add to administrative costs such as locating <br />a video segment, redacting or blurring images of individuals not relevant to the incident, <br />documenting changes, and copying the specific video segment. <br />The San Mateo County Sheriff's Office and other local law enforcement agencies use many <br />forms of modern technology including audio recorders worn on police officers, automobile <br />dashboard cameras ("dash cams"), and gunshot detection systems, 14 as well as surveillance <br />technologies such as license plate readers and closed-circuit TV. All of these technologies have <br />12 Officials from San Mateo County law enforcement: interviews by the Grand Jury. Adapted from Atherton Police <br />Department document. <br />13 Ibid. <br />14 A gunfire locator, or gunshot detection system, is a system that detects and conveys the location of gunfire <br />or other weapon fire using acoustic, optical, potentially other types of sensors, as well as a combination of <br />such sensors. <br />2015-2016 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury 4 <br />47 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.