My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2020-11-23 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
AgdaPkt 2020-11-23 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2020 5:27:49 PM
Creation date
11/19/2020 6:20:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
11/23/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
840
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.D. - Page 48 of 179 <br />While the statute of limitations for citizen complaints against a police officer is unlimited, the sole <br />remedy available to citizens who make such complaints are limited to disciplinary action against <br />an officer. Therefore, there is no financial risk to the City. <br />5. How can policies and procedures remain current in such a rapidly changing <br />environment? <br />As stated in the outset of this document, the legal landscape, public opinion, and technology <br />related to body cameras is rapidly evolving. The Committee believes that it is imperative that <br />Policy 450 be subjected to regular review and scrutiny by the MPP❑ and the citizens for the <br />foreseeable future. <br />The MPPD relies upon Lexipol for information concerning the changing legal landscape and <br />best practices in many areas including Policy 450. We encourage them to continue this practice <br />and to recommend policy and procedural changes as warranted. <br />Furthermore, the citizens of Menlo Park should be made aware of the information about Policy <br />450 that is available on the City's website and encouraged to voice their opinion through <br />conversations with the MPPD and their elected officials. <br />6. How will the MPPD be able to keep up with the pace of technological innovation, data <br />storage needs, network security, and backup/redundancy requirements? <br />Emerging technologies such as facial and voice recognition, background images, correlation of <br />body camera data with other surveillance data sets, pressure to share data between <br />jurisdictions, and cross mining practice (aka "big data") could create additional questions and <br />dilemmas that will require deep conversation and consideration. <br />The MPPD will face an enormous challenge of storing all of this data; securing it internally and <br />against outside threats, and protecting it from physical damage. Few systems can withstand an <br />attack from determined hackers such as those that go by the name "anonymous." Criminals and <br />government -based hacking programs are also able to penetrate most systems almost at will. <br />Should a fire occur in the MPPD data center the results could be catastrophic. The department <br />needs to take all practicable steps necessary in infrastructure and security systems to protect <br />the data itself and, more importantly, the privacy and integrity of the information. The systems <br />need to be future proofed so that evidence that is committed to a backup system in 2015 will still <br />be readable by computers in 2040. <br />Conclusion <br />This is the first time the Committee has been asked by the City Council to weigh-in on issue of <br />such public interest. The Committee is an unelected body and does not report to the Council. <br />We are a non-political group, and we serve at the pleasure of the Chief of Police. We appreciate <br />the opportunity to serve the Chief in the capacity of a citizen "sounding board" and to bring our <br />own ideas to MPPD through our regular meetings. If the City Council concludes that there is a <br />5of6 <br />2015-2016 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury 44 <br />87 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.