My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2020-11-23 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
AgdaPkt 2020-11-23 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2020 5:27:49 PM
Creation date
11/19/2020 6:20:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
11/23/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
840
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.D. - Page 57 of 179 <br />Finding #4 <br />The Atherton, Belmont, Foster City, and Menlo Park Police Departments have developed written <br />policies regarding the operation and data retention of body -worn camera systems as well as the <br />protection of the rights of the community and police officers. Hillsborough is in the process of <br />developing a similar policy. <br />The respondent agrees with the finding. <br />Finding #5 <br />Many local law enforcement agencies that currently do not employ body -worn cameras acknowledge <br />that these systems are beneficial and will likely be implemented in the future either voluntarily or by <br />mandate. <br />The respondent agrees with the finding. <br />Recommendation #1 <br />The Grand Jury recommends that the councils of those cities/towns that have not adopted body -worn <br />cameras direct their respective chiefs of police to develop an appropriate body -worn camera <br />implementation plan and advise the public of their plan by November 30, 2016. <br />Refer to response to Recommendation #2 for areas where the Sheriffs Office contracts for <br />law enforcement services. <br />Recommendation #2 <br />The Grand Jury recommends that the San Mateo County Sheriff develop a plan to implement body -worn <br />cameras and advise the public of his plan by November 30, 2016. <br />The recommendation will not be implemented by the specified date because it is not <br />reasonable given the time frame provided by the Grand Jury. <br />The Sheriffs Office continues to research best practices to determine the proper use of <br />body -worn cameras, storage of video data, and policies related to its operation, deployment <br />and use, while acknowledging that considerations such as privacy, legal discovery of <br />evidence and internal investigation must also be weighed. The Sheriffs Office believes <br />that it can benefit from observing and learning from other agencies' experiences in <br />implementing their own body -worn camera programs and would like a reasonable <br />opportunity to do so before implementing its own. Knowing that many of the <br />aforementioned concerns are not yet resolved, the Sheriff is cautiously approaching <br />implementing this technology and wants to ensure that these concerns are thoroughly <br />examined and tested over time. <br />The Sheriffs Office is currently deploying new generation in -car computer video. Over the <br />next several months the Sheriffs Office will outfit approximately 80 marked patrol <br />vehicles with in -car cameras; one forward and one rearward facing to include the backseat. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.