My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2021.01.25 Amended Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
AgdaPkt 2021.01.25 Amended Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2021 11:43:36 AM
Creation date
1/22/2021 5:57:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
1/25/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.A. — Pag&17T9f36andum <br />Financial Review of Proposed Sequoia Station Development <br />Figure 1: Existing Sequoia Station Site Plan' <br />a <br />a =a <br />a <br />W <br />Q t <br />a <br />hI <br />m <br />io r- <br />� f <br />d L n <br />O <br />M <br />FL CAMINo REAL <br />Nf1EU. alu 1462 <br />PI#tWd <br />Analytical Framework <br />MI <br />LON <br />September 28, 2020 <br />Page 2 <br />QLL <br />W <br />PYLON <br />OlD NAVI <br />For the purposes of this analysis, development feasibility is defined as a project that is likely to <br />generate a level of financial return typically needed to attract investment in the real estate <br />industry. EPS has evaluated this issue using a development pro forma model that simulates the <br />expected cash-flow from several building prototypes (e.g. a mixed-use office or residential <br />project). <br />As a proxy for development feasibility, EPS has estimated the likely residual land value for <br />alternative land use programs for the Sequoia Station site. Residual land value is defined as the <br />difference between total project development costs (including return on investment but excluding <br />land costs) and the market value of the finished product. Residual land value can provide a good <br />indication of what a real estate investor/developer might be willing to pay to acquire and <br />improve a site assuming the type of project under consideration can be built. <br />Table 1 summarizes five alternative land use concepts evaluated as part of this analysis. As <br />shown, EPS has compared the financial performance of two preliminary alternatives that roughly <br />correspond to those proposed by the developer against three hypothetical alternatives. The <br />hypothetical alternatives have been defined with input from City staff to test the economic <br />implications of critical land use parameters that are important to the planning process, including <br />1 Figure does not show existing below grade parking. <br />sna, «.,oaks a,zo,000=,o osz_0.eawooII,t,F s a a o eo oas oe a hese° oaS,tt Memo_ _. `09 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.