My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2021.01.25 Amended Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
AgdaPkt 2021.01.25 Amended Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2021 11:43:36 AM
Creation date
1/22/2021 5:57:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
1/25/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
From: - <br />To: GRP -City Council; Council -Diane Howard; Council-Giselle Hale; Council -Alicia Aguirre; Council-Lissette Esoinoza- <br />Garnica; Council -Diana Reddv; Council -Michael Smith <br />Cc: CLK-Pamela Aguilar; MGR -Melissa Stevenson Diaz <br />Subject: Study Session on Sequoia Station Project <br />Date: Saturday, January 23, 20212:55:55 PM <br />CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when <br />opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. <br />Honorable Mayor Howard, Vice Mayor Hale and Members of the City Council, <br />My name is Kaia Eakin and I am a resident of Redwood City. <br />Thank you for your care and consideration in evaluating the proposal for the new Sequoia Station <br />project. <br />It is very exciting to have a large project like this near transit proposed for our city. As our careful <br />planning over many years envisions, dense development near transit, transit oriented <br />development, is the best way to develop and this site right now can definitely accommodate more <br />density. I applaud the concept of building up and of placing parking partially underground and <br />stacking, rather than the current vast array of a parking lot. This proposal has a lot of nice aspects <br />and in a lot of ways is an improvement to the current use. <br />However, I believe, there needs to be more housing and less office in the proposal. As residents <br />and as a community, we have the power to make our downtown be what is best for all of us. It is <br />best to have a lot more housing and a lot less office. Is this expensive? Yes. Is housing more <br />expensive than office? Yes. But, just because it is expensive for the developer to provide and for <br />the city to support (with a higher need for infrastructure, schools, fire, police, etc) doesn't mean it <br />shouldn't happen. We have a housing crisis and a climate crisis. We do not have an office crisis. <br />So, to fix the housing crisis and climate crisis, we as a community need to be willing to ask our <br />developers and city and ourselves to do more, not just to settle for what's easy. We need to push <br />this project to be better. Better means more housing and less office. <br />Thank you for your consideration and for your service. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Kaia Eakin <br />Redwood City Resident <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.