My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2021.01.25 Amended Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
AgdaPkt 2021.01.25 Amended Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2021 11:43:36 AM
Creation date
1/22/2021 5:57:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
1/25/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.13. - Page 15 of 24 <br />Task 2. Evaluate Proposed Projects and Probable Construction Cost <br />Task 2a. Inspection and Observation Evaluation <br />Consultant shall compile the inspection and observation data for further review. Review <br />will include identifying specific deficiencies and areas that may need repair in the near <br />future. These areas will be tabulated and located on an exhibit for later use in the report. <br />Task 2b. Proposed Project Identification <br />Consultant shall outline conceptual repair projects based on the areas identified in Task <br />2a. Concepts will be described in short list form, given identification numbers for cross- <br />referencing and shown schematically on an exhibit for later use in the report. Concepts <br />will be developed to the extent that we will be able to obtain engineer's opinion of probable <br />construction cost. <br />Task 2c. Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost <br />Consultant shall prepare an Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction cost based on <br />the projects identified in Task 2b, at a conceptual level, these costs will be based on <br />typical linear feet of pipe replacement and reflective of the conceptual nature of the <br />proposed. We will not be obtaining bid costs from contractors. <br />Task 3. Project Prioritization, Assessment Calculations, and Report <br />Task 3a. Project Prioritization <br />Consultant shall prioritize the proposed projects identified in Task 2b. Consultant shall <br />meet with City staff to review the projects and evaluate the critical projects that would <br />result in failure or poor performance of the system. Projects will be ranked and given an <br />expected date for repair for the upcoming 5 -year budget cycle. <br />Task 3b. Assessment Calculations <br />With the projects prioritized and engineer's opinion of probable construction cost, <br />Consultant shall calculate the expected assessments for the 5 -year budget cycle. <br />Assessments will be broken down by system type and proposed project to create the <br />overall program for repair or replacement during the 5 -year budget cycle. Assessments <br />will also be broken down by parcel to identify individual parcel assessment, based on the <br />prior City Manager's report. <br />REV: 12-23-2020 PR <br />ATTY/AGR.2020.312/BKF Engineers (CFD No. 2020-1 Seaport Centre/Seaport Plaza) (Page 12 of 17) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.