My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2021.02.08 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
AgdaPkt 2021.02.08 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2021 4:35:44 PM
Creation date
2/4/2021 4:26:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
2/8/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
612
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.A. - Page 14 of 36 <br />BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2021 <br />DEVORA"DEV" DAVIS, CHAIR <br />STEVE HEMINGER, VICE CHAIR <br />CINDY CHAVEZ <br />JEFF GEE <br />DAVE PINE <br />CHARLES STONE <br />SHAMANN WALTON <br />MONIQUE ZMUDA <br />JIM HARTNETT <br />EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR <br />Background <br />Redwood City Station is the fifth -busiest station in the Caltrain system. Prior to the COVID-19 <br />pandemic, the station served approximately 4,200 weekday riders. Ridership has doubled since <br />2010 as Redwood City has added more residents and jobs near the station. Over the next two <br />decades, Caltrain expects ridership to more than double again as development activity, service <br />improvements, and a potential Dumbarton rail connection drives strong demand at Redwood <br />City Station. <br />Caltrain 2040 Service Vision & Redwood City Station <br />The Caltrain Business Plan envisions Redwood City Station as a major mid -peninsula hub of the <br />Caltrain system. The Business Plan's 2040 Service Vision includes two types of regional trains <br />serving the Caltrain corridor — Local trains and Express trains — that would meet for timed <br />transfers at Redwood City Station to help reduce travel times for longer trips. For example, a <br />passenger traveling from Burlingame to San Jose could transfer from a Local train to an Express <br />train at Redwood City to save 10 minutes of travel time. <br />In order to implement the 2040 Service Vision, Redwood City Station would be expanded from <br />two tracks to four tracks. A four -track station would enable cross -platform transfers between <br />Local and Express trains, and to facilitate Express trains overtaking Local trains. Without an <br />expanded station, Caltrain cannot realize this vision to operate Express and Local services given <br />the significant constraints of the Caltrain corridor and the future challenges associated with both <br />expanding Caltrain service and introducing future High Speed Rail trains. Rebuilding Redwood <br />City Station also presents an opportunity to coordinate with planned transit -oriented <br />development, address needs for grade separations and improve station access. <br />Alternatives Considered <br />As a major ridership center at the approximate midpoint of the Caltrain corridor, Redwood City <br />Station is well suited to serve as Caltrain's mid -Peninsula hub. Other stations location options <br />were considered but are not suggested for further study at this time due to less optimal outcomes <br />for service, ridership, operations, and infrastructure. <br />Caltrain initially considered nearby stations such as San Carlos and Menlo Park for the mid - <br />Peninsula hub, but each posed challenges and tradeoffs. If either of these stations were selected, <br />they would receive Express train service instead of Redwood City, cutting Redwood City's <br />potential future service from a planned eight trains per hour per direction to four. From a demand <br />standpoint, this would result in lower system ridership overall since both San Carlos and Menlo <br />190 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.