Laserfiche WebLink
7A <br /> Page 18 <br /> 1. Looking At#he required uses of recycted water fnr new development in Redwood Cif�, <br /> what would he the pubIic benefit? <br /> 2. What are your cmcaerns regarding the requir�d uses? <br /> 3. Hvw could your concerns be addrressedfsolved? <br /> 4. What are your thou,ghts on the volunfary uses of recycled water for new development? <br /> • Public benefzt <br /> • concaerns <br /> 5. How caulcl your cancerrts b�e addressed/solued? <br /> b. Do you supyort the proposed Nezo Recycied Water Ordinnnre for nezv devetop�nent? <br /> GROUP 1 <br /> 1. Public Benefit <br /> � Conservation of Potable Water <br /> • Susta.inable use of our rasources <br /> • Education/Awareness-water is not infinite <br /> • Puts city on record with standazdized regulations for future developments <br /> • Econamics-Regulation will help reduce cost. <br /> • Will stimulate needed rssearch. <br /> 2. Required I.Ises Concerns <br /> • Recycled water will nofi be used.in any parks and schools,playgrounds <br /> • Lack of public understanding that could cause not ta accept it. <br /> • Cost to city of implementa.tion <br /> • Misuse waste of a scarce resource <br /> • Control of input and output of water resources. <br /> • 4zdinance not phased fast enough. <br /> 3. Voluntary IIses/benefit and concerns <br /> • No agenda distribution facilitates(PIPES)to where water was used <br /> � Want to see more incentive ta use recycled water,i.e. economic. <br /> • Economic viability ofvoluntary uses of water <br /> • Maximize the use of recycled water in general <br /> 4, Soiutions <br /> • City must pass ordinance sooner to cut waste <br /> � Continue to press for more usets. <br /> • TARGET high water users outside of recycled wate�c area <br /> • Mare educational forums like this. <br /> • Adopt best practices being used elsewhere. <br /> • Rapid implemeniations of current plan. <br /> 5. Support (5 for) <br />