Laserfiche WebLink
7A <br /> Page 21 <br /> GROUP 4 <br /> 1. Pubric Benefit <br /> � Save cirinking water£or better uses <br /> • Delay rationing <br /> • AI1ow development <br /> • Squeeze more people inta Redwood City(population growth} <br /> • Job growth/increase tax base <br /> • Accomplish change without increasing wa#er use <br /> � Environmentally conscious <br /> 2. Required Llses Concerns <br /> • The requirement for recycled water is a farce. The projection af <br /> running out of water is a farce. Past forecasts have been untxue.Past <br /> fears have not been realized. Official do what they want. <br /> • Double plumbing will increase the cost of exisEing and new housing. <br /> Will cost o£piping be of#set by cast af recycled water <br /> • Usage shoutd be fairty applied not determined bq palitical influence <br /> � Extension of usage beyond condas to communities with c�mmon <br /> areas <br /> • How is the Generai PIan for downtown RWC to be accomplished <br /> • Recycled water precludes RWC from getting water from other places <br /> (getting drinking wa#er from seawater and capturing rainwafier <br /> 3. How could your concerns be addresses? <br /> • Explanation to the public regarding the exclusion of srhools <br /> • Enforcing policy am,ang users especially for new construcEion through <br /> t.t►e planning process <br /> • Harness public volunteers interested in helping RWC accomplish its <br /> goals <br /> 4. Voluntary Lise�/benefit and concerns <br /> • Shouid be required to prevent retrofitting <br /> • Positive idea <br /> • Require new developments ta use recycled watex in coxnmon areas <br /> and have capability for voluntaiy homeowner use <br /> • Where does water fram fire sprinklers in buildings originate? <br /> 5. Solutions <br /> • Require recycled water be used for fire sprinklers if feasible <br /> s Public education <br /> • Present both side of the arguznent when educating <br /> 6. Support(3 yes,2 not unfil ardinance is defined) <br />