My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2008-05-12
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2008
>
AgdaPkt 2008-05-12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2013 12:44:05 PM
Creation date
5/8/2008 4:39:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
5/12/2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
224
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7A <br /> Page 18 <br /> 1. Loakeng at the requirer�uses nf recycled wa#er for new c�eveloprnent in I�edwood Cify, <br /> urhat would b�e the public b�eneftt? <br /> 2. Wfutt are your conoerns regarding the required uses? <br /> 3. How could your concerns bee addr�essed/solved? <br /> 4. What are your thoughts on the volunfary uses of recycled water for new development? <br /> • Publ�c benefit <br /> • conaertis <br /> 5. Hozo could your concerns be addressed/sotz�ed? <br /> 6. Do you support the proposed Nezu Recycied Water Ordinnnce fvr new develop�nent? <br /> GROUPI <br /> 1. Pubtic Benefit <br /> • Conservation of Potable Water <br /> • Sustainable use of our resources <br /> • Education/Awareness-water is not infinite <br /> • Puts city on record with standardized regulations for future developments <br /> • Econornics-Regalation will help reduce cost. <br /> • Will stimutate needed.research. <br /> 2 Required Ilses Concerns <br /> . Recycled water will not be used in any parks and schools,playgrounds <br /> • Lack of public understanding that could cause not ta accept it. <br /> • Cost to city of implementation <br /> • Misuse waste of a scarce resaurce <br /> � Control of input and output af water resources. <br /> • Ordinance not phased fast enough. <br /> 3. Voluntary Llses/benefit and concerns <br /> • No agenda.distribution facilitates{PIl'ES)to where water was used <br /> • Want to see mare incentive ta usc recycled water,i.e. econornic. <br /> • Economic viability of voluntary uses of water <br /> • Maximize the use of recycled waxer in general <br /> 4. Solutions <br /> • City must pass ordinance sooner to cut waste <br /> • Continue to press for more users. <br /> • TARGET hi�water users outside of recycled water area <br /> s More educational forurns like this. <br /> • Adopt best practices being used elsewhere. <br /> • Rapid implementations of current plan. <br /> 5. Suppart (5 for) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.