Laserfiche WebLink
7A <br /> Page 21 <br /> GROUr� <br /> 1. Fublic BenefYt <br /> � Save cirinking water for better uses <br /> • Delay rationing <br /> • Ailow development <br /> • Squeeze more people inta Redwood City(popuiation growth) <br /> • job growthJincrease tax base <br /> • Accomplish change withont increasing water use <br /> • Environmentally conSCious <br /> 2. Required Llses Concerns <br /> • The requirement for recyded water is a farce. The projection af <br /> runnir�g out of water is a farce. Past forecasts have been untrue.Past <br /> fears have not been realized. Official do what they want. <br /> • Double plumbing will increase the cost of existing and new housing. <br /> Will cost o#piping be offset by cost of recycled water <br /> • Usage should be fairly applied not determined by political influence <br /> � Extension of usage beyond condos to communities with c�mmon <br /> areas <br /> • How is the General Plan for downtown RWC#o be accomplished <br /> + Recycled water precludes RWC from getting water from other places <br /> {getting drinicing wa#er from seawater and capturing rainwater <br /> 3. How could your concerns be addresses? <br /> • Explanation to the pnblic regarding the exclusion of schools <br /> • Enforcing policy amang users especially for new construction through <br /> e p anning process <br /> • Harness pnblic voluntePrs interested in helping RWC accomplish its <br /> goals <br /> 4. Voluntary tise�/benefit and concerns <br /> • Should be required to prevent retrofifiting <br /> • Positive idea <br /> • Require new developments ta use zecycled water in common areas <br /> and have capability for voluntaiy homeowner nse <br /> • Where does water from fire sprinklers in buildings originate? <br /> 5. Sotutians <br /> • Require recycled water be used for fire sprinklers if feasible <br /> • Public education <br /> • Present both side of the azguznent when educating <br /> 6. Support(3 yes,2 not until ordinanre is defined) <br />