My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2008-06-09
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2008
>
AgdaPkt 2008-06-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2008 3:27:51 PM
Creation date
6/5/2008 3:01:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
6/9/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
194
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />8A <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />'May Revise' Continued from Page 1... <br /> <br />Important to cities is the fact that the Governor's plan does not propose to borrow cities' share of <br />property taxes through Proposition 1A and continues to provide full Proposition 42 transportation <br />funding. <br /> <br />The Governor's reluctance to borrow local funds to fill the deficit appears to be based upon his <br />philosophy that the state must address its own budget problems. In his annual State of the State <br />address in January, the Governor acknowledged that previously, in times of budget shortfalls, the <br />Legislature took money from local governments, transportation, bonds and pension funds. He told <br />Californians that those avenues are now limited due to several voter-approved initiatives. <br /> <br />This theme was reiterated when the Governor discussed his May revise proposal on May 14. In <br />response to a reporter's question about proposed additional cuts to Health and Human Service <br />programs, he said, "Everyone has to tighten their belts. Local government has to tighten their <br />belts, we have to tighten our belts." <br /> <br />The Governor also mentioned his recent travels and town hall meetings held throughout <br />California this spring. In those meetings, he said he repeatedly heard that the state must fix its <br />budget system and not spend beyond its own means. The Governor said in his opening remarks <br />on May 14, "What they want us to do is to fix our dysfunctional budget system once and for all, so <br />that we don't have to go through this pain every time the economy cools off." <br /> <br />The Governor's revised budget retains the proposed 10 percent across-the-board cuts to state <br />agencies, but increases funding for K-12 education to meet the minimum threshold for <br />Proposition 98, eliminates the prior proposal for the early release of 20,000 inmates, and prevents <br />state park closures by increasing fees. <br /> <br />Through executive order, the revised budget would also create a bipartisan tax commission called <br />the Tax Modernization Commission. The created body would be comprised of legislative and <br />gubernatorial appointees charged with budget reform that would improve the state's tax laws. <br /> <br />Funding Areas of Specific Interest to Cities <br /> <br />The Governor's revised budget includes funding allocations for these programs of importance to <br />California cities. <br /> <br />Public Safety <br /> <br />COPS/Juvenile Justice Grants. The Citizen Option for Public Safety (COPS)/Juvenile Justice <br />Crime Prevention Act Program is subject to the Governor's across-the-board January proposed <br />10 percent cuts to state agencies. The revised budget would continue to fund these programs at <br />a level of $214 million. <br /> <br />Booking Fees. Payments to counties for Local Detention Facilities (Gov Code 29552) were also <br />subject to the January budget's proposed 10 percent reduction. The revised budget maintains the <br />amount proposed in January of $31.5 million. Current law stipulates that in any year that the <br />budget appropriation is less than $35 million, counties may impose booking fees on cities in <br />proportion to the amount under appropriation. In this case, it would be up to 10 percent of cost. <br /> <br />Early Release/Summary Parole. While the Governor's May revise withdraws the "early release" <br />proposals, the summary parole program included in his January budget continues as a proposal <br />for a cost savings of $173.6 million, approximately $75.7 million more than previously estimated <br />for FY 2008-09. <br /> <br />"Summary parole" is defined as the status of a person who is under the jurisdiction of the <br />California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) during their parole period but is <br />not subject to regular and active supervision by the CDCR. The COCR has the authority to <br />continue to provide services, as deemed necessary, to any person on summary parole. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.