Laserfiche WebLink
<br />8A <br />Page 15 <br /> <br />San Luis Obispo Tribune (5/8/08) <br />Santa Maria Times (5/12/08) <br />Santa Rosa Press Democrat (5/22/08) <br />San Mateo County Times (5/4/08) <br />San Ramon Valley Times (5/4/08) <br />Santa Cruz Sentinel (5/5/08) <br />Sonoma Index- Tribune (5/20/08) <br />Tulare Advance Register (5/8/08) <br />Tracy Press (5/16/08) <br /> <br />Tri- Valley Herald (5/4/08) <br />Visa/ia Times Delta (5/8/08) <br />Vacavil/e Reporter (5/7/08) <br />Valley Times (5/4/08) <br />Weekly Calistogan (5/22/08) <br />West County Times (5/4/08) <br />Whittier Daily News (5n/08) <br />Woodland Daily Democrat (5/8/08) <br /> <br />Proposition 99 Offers Voters Responsible Eminent Domain Reform <br /> <br />Many of the papers who have opposed Prop. 98 are supporting Proposition 99, the Homeowners <br />Protection Act, which is also slated for the June 2008 ballot. This measure offers true eminent <br />domain reform by prohibiting the government from using eminent domain to take a home to <br />transfer to a private developer. Prop. 99 is supported by a broad coalition of homeowners, <br />businesses, labor groups, cities, counties and environmentalists. It contains no hidden provisions. <br />The League strongly supports Prop. 99. <br /> <br />For more information about the two measures visit www.no98yes99.com. <br /> <br />Safe Neighborhoods Act Targeted for November 2008 Ballot <br /> <br />Supporters of the "Safe Neighborhoods Act: Stop Gang, Gun, and Street Crime" submitted signatures to <br />election officials on April 25 to qualify the measure for the November 2008 ballot. To date, the Secretary <br />of State's office has not announced that the measure has qualified. <br /> <br />Political positioning over this measure has already begun in the Legislature with the recent action of the <br />Senate Budget Subcommittee #4 to eliminate funding for Citizen Options for Public Safety (COPS), <br />Booking Fees and other local public safety programs from the Senate's version of the budget. <br />Republicans and law enforcement groups are supporting this measure, while Democrats, teachers and <br />other groups criticize the measure for its impact on the state budget. The Governor has not yet taken a <br />position and continues in his May revise to propose that these local public safety programs be funded at <br />traditional levels, but subject to the 10 percent across-the-board cuts he proposed in January. <br /> <br />The League of California Cities has not taken a position on the initiative and is in the process of analyzing <br />this comprehensive proposal for its potential impact on cities. Cities are encouraged to delay any action <br />on the proposal until it qualifies for the ballot and the League completes its analysis. The measure will be <br />tracked and updates will be provided through Priority Focus and on the League's Web site. <br /> <br />What the Measure Proposes to Do <br /> <br />In brief, the Safe Neighborhoods Act would: <br /> <br />. Create a new state office, the "Office of Public Safety Education and Information" that would <br />provide the public with information on crime and crime prevention via the Internet and other <br />media outlets, administer various competitive law enforcement grant programs established <br />under the initiative, and establish and maintain a gang database. <br />. Create a new state commission, the "California Early InteNention, Rehabilitation, and <br />Accountability Commission," to evaluate publicly funded crime prevention programs. <br />. Lock in, prohibiting reduction or alteration by the Legislature, virtually all state funded law <br />enforcement programs at their 2007 programmatic designs and funding levels plus annual <br />inflationary growth. These programs include: <br />o COPS - including city/county frontline law enforcement subventions increased from <br />$119 million to $125 million (plus annual growth factor thereafter) <br />o Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention subventions increased from $119 million to $125 <br />million (plus annual growth factor thereafter) <br />o Jail Detention Facility (Jail Efficiency Fund) Subventions (re: Booking Fees) <br /> <br />5 <br />