Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7A <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Zoninq Code Desiqnations <br /> <br />1. Tidal Plain; and <br />2. Redwood Shores Bay Front. <br /> <br />Any legislative action that would permit any use of those identified areas other than for <br />agriculture, public parks and recreation, restored wetlands, or certain extractions from <br />the San Francisco Bay, would require approval by at least two-thirds of the City's voters <br />at a City election. <br /> <br />The initiative contains a few exemptions from the two-thirds voter approval requirement, <br />including when a property owner obtains a vested right by the effective date of the <br />initiative, when the City Council determines that application of the vote requirement <br />constitutes an unconstitutional taking of property, and when the City Council determines <br />that use of designated lands is necessary in order to comply with its housing obligations <br />under state law. <br /> <br />On May 28, 2008, proponents of the initiative filed the petition for verification, The <br />petition was required to be signed by at least 15 percent of the registered voters of the <br />City, which amounted to 5,268 voters. After a full review of the petition, the County <br />Elections Office determined that it contained 6,527 valid signatures. Accordingly, on <br />June 20,2008, the City Clerk certified the petition as sufficient, and will submit the <br />matter to the City Council to review at its next regular meeting, scheduled for July 7, <br />2008. <br /> <br />RESPONSES TO CITY COUNCIL QUESTIONS <br /> <br />Following are responses to questions raised by City Council members during the <br />May 19, 2008 public meeting. For ease of reference, staff has organized the questions <br />by subject matter rather than in the order they were asked. The responses are meant to <br />provide the public and the City Council with a general understanding about the potential <br />scope of the initiative and are not meant to be comprehensive or exhaustive. <br />Individuals having particular concerns about the effect of the proposed initiative on their <br />particular parcels of land or interests should confer with their own legal counsel. <br /> <br />SECTION I: Requirements for Passing the Initiative and any Competing or <br />Subsequent Initiatives <br /> <br />1. Can the City Charter be changed by a majority vote to require a <br />subsequent two-thirds vote on the issues encompassed by the <br />initiative? <br /> <br />Response: Yes, the City Charter can only be amended by a majority vote. Both City <br />and State law require that a Charter amendment must be approved by a <br />majority vote. (City Charter, 992; Cal. Canst., art. XI, 93.) Thus, <br />amendments to the City Charter, including the initiative, must be by <br />majority vote, not a super-majority vote. (See Howard Jarvis Taxpayers <br />Assn. v. City of San Diego (2004) 120 Cal.App.4lh 374.) <br /> <br />2 <br />