Laserfiche WebLink
<br />08/04/2008 <br /> <br />CEQA review will be appropriate only if or when any such project is proposed. <br />The proposed amendment states that any future project is subject to CEQA. <br />Therefore, CEQA review at this time would be premature and speculative and <br />would not allow any meaningful analysis of potential impacts. (Friends of the <br />Sierra Railroad v. Tuolumne Park & Recreation Dist. (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 643, <br />655-656; Concerned McCloud Citizens v. McCloud Community Services Dist. <br />(2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 181.) <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD <br />CITY, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER <br />AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />SECTION 1: That pursuant to Section 92 of the Charter, Section 3 of <br />Article XI of the California Constitution and section 9255 of the Elections Code of <br />the State of California, the City Council hereby submits "The Voter Approval <br />Requirement Regarding Future Development of Cargill Lands", (the "Majority <br />Vote Amendment") Charter amendment to the voters that would add section 6a <br />to the Charter. <br /> <br />SECTION 2. The full text of the proposed charter amendment and <br />accompanying map to be submitted to the voters are attached hereto as Exhibit <br />"A-1 thru A-2". <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />A TTY/RESO/RESO.1839 <br />080608 <br /> <br />14881 <br />Muff # 308 <br />