Laserfiche WebLink
<br />8A <br />Page 11 <br /> <br />'Budget' Continued from Page 1... <br /> <br />Details of Budget Proposal Remain Sketchy <br /> <br />Rumors emerged mid-week about a possible budget agreement between Senate Pro Tem Don Perata (0- <br />Oakland) and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Although the details of this agreement have not been released, <br />some of the themes remain: a temporary sales tax increase, additional cuts, some budget reform, etc. The <br />good news for cities is that so far the Pro Tem has repeatedly told the press that the deal does not involve <br />any borrowing. <br /> <br />The League is still working to determine if this budget deal includes a $200 million on-going take from <br />redevelopment funds. Such a proposal would have significant impact on cities and the state as a whole <br />because redevelopment funds provide vital economic stimulus and local infrastructure investments. <br /> <br />With the state's commitment to meeting the goals of AB 32, the seizure of 5 percent of redevelopment funds <br />would only cause the state to lose vital ground in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Redevelopment <br />agencies are the only local infrastructure and economic development tool that focuses on rebuilding urban <br />cores and expanding infill development-the type of development that is essential to altering land use <br />planning patterns to reduce emissions. <br /> <br />The California Building Industry Association (CBIA) and the Major Home Builders Council (MHBC) have <br />been actively working the Administration and Republican legislators in opposition to a redevelopment shift. <br />The League appreciates their focused efforts to try to prevent this terrible budget solution. The letter from the <br />CBIA underscores the fact the state will lose $20,000 in revenue for every unit of housing not constructed, <br />and redevelopment agencies are responsible for the construction of 10,000 affordable units each year-a <br />potential loss to the state of $160 million to the state. <br /> <br />Deadlines and Other Factors <br /> <br />There are some upcoming key deadlines and other factors which may impact the culmination of a budget <br />deal: <br /> <br />· California Secretary of State Debra Bowen set Saturday, Aug. 16 as the deadline (that often slips) for <br />measures to qualify for the November 2008 ballot. Changes to the high speed rail bond, any <br />Constitutional budget reform, and a possible water bond must be placed on the November ballot. <br />While lawmakers can change statutory deadlines that apply to placing issues on the ballot, the cost <br />of delay escalates and practical problems are created for election officials producing ballot <br />pamphlets. <br /> <br />· The Democratic National Convention starts Aug. 25 in Denver, Colo. and many Democratic <br />legislators had planned to attend. Senate Pro Tem Perata instructed his caucus to cancel their trips <br />without a budget. Some Assembly members, however, appear to be making plans to attend. <br /> <br />· Aug. 31 is the Constitutional deadline for the end of the 2007-08 legislative session. The Legislature <br />could continue in an emergency session after that deadline. <br /> <br />· The Governor has also vowed to veto all bills that reach his desk until a budget agreement is <br />reached. This may become more significant as the Aug. 31, adjournment date approaches. <br /> <br />League Engages City Officials, City Managers and Board <br /> <br />This week the League held several special meetings to update members and energize participation in the <br />budget process. <br /> <br />League Executive Director Chris McKenzie convened several conference calls on Tuesday, Aug. 12, with <br />city managers statewide to alert them to some facts and myths about the budget. The concem is that the <br />state budget could rely on mandatory "loans" of local government and transportation funds that may never be <br />repaid and a seizure of redevelopment funds. <br /> <br />2 <br />