Laserfiche WebLink
<br />78 <br />Page 18 <br /> <br />Environmental Enhancements} for both the North and South Districts are consistent with the <br />scores for the Combined Districts.' <br /> <br />There is no advantage to awarding separate contracts for the North or South Districts due to <br />significantly higher costs to award separate contracts as presented in Table 3 - Total Annual <br />Cost for North, South and Combined Districts. A more detailed analysis of the cost <br />proposals can be found in Appendix A - Summary of Cost Proposals. <br /> <br />Table 3. Total Annual Cost for North, South and Combined Districts <br /> <br /> <br />BEST $29,684,195 $30,416,612 $52,165,632 $7,935,175 13.20% <br />Norcal $24,950,533 $26,362,750 $46,239,552 $5,073,731 9.89% <br />Republic $32,750,958 $32.580,382 $63,811.856 $1,519,484 2.33% <br />* Costs include proposed operating costs (2008 costs) plus 10-year average annual interest <br />costs. <br /> <br />4.2 Summary of Proposer Evaluation Highlights <br />The following is a summary highlighting the evaluation results of the four proposers in order of <br />ranking. <br /> <br />Norcsl Waste Svstems of San Mateo Countv <br /> <br />1. Norcal is an experienced solid waste, recycling and organics collection company <br />providing service to one of the most mature and largest single stream and organics <br />recycling programs in California (Le.. City and County of San Francisco). The company <br />pioneered commercial organics recycling collection service In Northern California and is <br />highly committed to diversion from all service sectors. <br /> <br />2. The company is employee owned and has been operating in Northern California for over <br />88 years. It currently has nine local contracts providing service to more than 600,000 <br />residential and 50,000 commercial accounts. <br /> <br />3. The collection approach and technical proposal was the most thorough and complete of <br /> <br />1 Republic's proposal indicated that they would not develop an additi onal corporation yard and <br />would only use the Shoreway facility regardless of being awarded a contract for either the North <br />or South District. Therefore, Republic's position on the development of a second facility was not <br />in compliance with the requirements of the RFP. <br />SBWMA Collection Services RFP Page 7 of 31 <br />Selection Committee Report: August 21, 2008 <br />Evaluation and Scoring of Proposals <br />