Laserfiche WebLink
<br />8A <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />these funds; however other lawmakers from both parties appear to be seriously considering this <br />option. <br /> <br />What's at Risk for Cities and Taxpayers If the Legislature Insists on Borrowing <br /> <br />Notwithstanding the strong opposition of the Govemor and the Senate Pro T em , rumors persist <br />that a package of multiple borrowing proposals will be offered as part of a budget package - <br />perhaps in the next day or so. Any proposal to incur more operating debt by borrowing from a <br />wide range of local govemment and other voter approved protected funds is fraught with interest <br />rate and related securitization problems. <br /> <br />The League was recently advised that the state would have to repay local agencies at a <br />constitutionally set interest rate of 7 percent per year. However, a local agency that can't afford to <br />wait for repayment by the state could be forced to securitize the state's repayment obligation, <br />raising the cost to the state or the local agency (and taxpayers) by an additional 7-12 percent. <br />The cost of securitizing receivables from the state has risen dramatically since the 2004 Vehicle <br />License Fee (VLF) gap loan securitization because of the melt down in the bond insurance <br />industry and turmoil in the municipal bond market. <br /> <br />State's Economic Recovery At Stake If the Redevelopment ERAF Shift Occurs <br /> <br />City officials understand that redevelopment may be Califomia's most important program for <br />creating high quality construction jobs, making investments that help reduce greenhouse gas <br />emissions, and in supporting the economic recovery that is so vital to the long-term fiscal health <br />of our state government. <br /> <br />The state reaps tremendous income tax, sales tax and property tax benefits from redevelopment <br />projects. Reducing redevelopment funding is the political equivalent of a farmer eating his own <br />seed com. You may be ravenously hungry, but you dare not eat it because you will have nothing <br />the next year. <br /> <br />What City Officials Can Do <br /> <br />City officials should contact the Governor, (916) 445-2841, to thank him for his partnership with <br />cities and his understanding of the important role cities play in providing public safety and other <br />services to residents. Please acknowledge the Governor's his continued strong stance on <br />protecting local government revenues that goes back to 2004 and the passage of Prop. 1A with <br />84 percent of the vote. City officials with concems about the RDA impacts should also share this <br />with the Governor immediately. <br /> <br />Phone instructions for calling the Governor: <br /> <br />. Call (916) 445-2841 <br />. Press #1 for English <br />. Wait for the menu options <br />. # 1 Address, Fax Number <br />. #2 to voice an opinion on legislation <br />. #5 to voice an opinion on hot issues <br />. #6 to speak to a representative <br /> <br />In addition, city officials should a(so contact their legislators and explain the likely impacts of <br />budget cuts in their city (with specifics). Ask legislators to work with their colleagues and the <br />Govemor to produce a budget that avoids borrowing and seizing local redevelopment funds that <br />are critical to our state's economic recovery. <br /> <br />'ILG' Continued from Page 1... <br /> <br />By 2012, naturalized adults, naturalization-eligible immigrants, and young-adult citizen children of <br />immigrants could represent 7.7 million voters in California, or 29 percent of the electorate. Pastor, <br />a professor in USC's departments of geography and American studies and ethnicity, will present <br /> <br />3 <br />