My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2008-10-27 Clsd and Reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2008
>
AgdaPkt 2008-10-27 Clsd and Reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2008 4:42:54 PM
Creation date
10/23/2008 3:43:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
10/27/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
143
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />88(2) <br />Page 1 <br /> <br />Redwood City. Building a Great Community Tog.th.r <br />Housing Policy Follow-up to City Council <br />Matters of Council Interest - October 21, 2008 <br /> <br />Purpose: Establish a process for moving forward with a housing pOlicy/ordinance -to follow-up on the Coundll <br />Housing and Human Concerns Committee (HHCC) joint session on s..25. The HHCC was encouraged to initiate <br />work on the Housfng Element of the New General Plan with the Planning Commission. Part of this work was to <br />include consideration of an indusionary housing policy, induding exploration of an Interim policy. Staff was <br />directed to come back to Council with several information pieces and recommendations for a process, induding <br />a potential "interim indusionary housing polio/'. <br /> <br />Background: The most recent public engagement on this issue was a joint study session of the Planning <br />Commission (PC) and HHCC on Sept. 9, 2008. The PC gave clear direction to staff that they may be quite <br />supportive of an inclusionary housing policy, but not of an interim policy. They expressed that there appears to <br />be little risk at this time for missing out on units because of the housing slowdown attributed with the local <br />Downtown Precise Plan lawsuit and the national status of the economy I housing market. They do not want to <br />see a rushed interim policy. They preferred that we carefully draft. then vet - a permanent policy/ordinance for <br />final review through a process including HHCC, PC, and finally Coundl. Planning and Housing Staff think this is <br />excellent direction and that it is very responsive to Council and the HHCC <br /> <br />Process:. Staff proposes the following sequence of actions for bringing a policy forward: <br />1. Council: Confirm the process with Council at their meeting of 10-27. This will clarify that Council accepts <br />the PC's desire for moving forward in a different way than may have been inferred at the close of the 8/25 <br />discussion. <br />2. Consultant/Staff: Hire a consultant to draft a policy/ordinance that staff can recommend: It should be <br />borne from the HHCC's concepts and carefully incorporate PC and Council comments and direction: It <br />should provide fleXibility and it should not hinder housing development. <br />3. HHOCI PC Tentatively scheduled to condude Housing Element discussion on 12/2/08. They will be <br />presented with a summary of prior/current policies and how the City has managed with them. Present draft <br />guiding principles for developing housing policy recommendations. <br />4. HHCC: Report the process for developing an inclusionary housing policy to the HHCC as an update. <br />S. Developers, Real Estate Professionals, and Housing Advocates: Conduct outreach and vet the draft. <br />Provide regular updates to Mayor and Vice Mayor. <br />6. Oty Attorney I outSide special counsel: Thorough legal review - throughout the process. Whether the <br />Council ultimately adopts a policy or an ordinance, it will ultimately be viewed as law and entitlement <br />requirements, and thus must be able to wIthstand rigorous legal challenges. It needs to be prepared in the <br />context of existing laws, polities, and other competing objectives in order to be effective. Thus it needs to <br />be prepared by experts in the field. The need for CEQA review and other issues associated with the logistics <br />of policy review will also be fully confirmed. <br />7. HHOC I PC: Provide one or two updates to PC and H HCC while drafting and outreach is going on. <br />8.HHCC:Request a final r-ecommendationfrom HHCCan the. draft polky. <br />9. PC Request a final recommendation from PC on the draft policy. <br />10'. Council: Return to Countll with final draft With PC, HHCC, and staff recommendations {which may be <br />different) after vetting with the development and housing community. This should be concurrent with the <br />New General Plan and Housing Element adoption. <br /> <br />Respectfully, <br /> <br />Vy-_/ <br /> <br />Peter Ingram <br />City Manager <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.