Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Council took a 10-minute break and the meeting resumed at 9:15 p.m. <br /> <br />B. Responses to City Council Questions (April 14, 2008) Regarding the Proposed <br />Initiative Measure Amending the Charter of Redwood City - San Francisco Bay Front <br />and City Park Land. <br /> <br />Mayor Foust prefaced the public comment and framed it in such a way that Council is <br />not directing and/or managing the outcome. She stated Council and the community <br />were working together and City Attorney Yamamoto would answer questions that arose. <br />She asked for respect, patience and understanding from all involved. <br /> <br />City Attorney Yamamoto gave an overview of what occurred at the April 14, 2008 <br />meeting. Mr. Yamamoto pointed out the proposed measure was conceived and written <br />by private parties and staff was not engaged in this effort. His staff report and analysis <br />spoke to questions raised by the community and Council at prior meetings. He <br />stressed private property owners with specific interests should seek out their own expert <br />legal advice and not solely rely on comments made. Council asked if areas could be <br />marked/shown on the map for the areas mentioned in the report. Council asked for <br />clarifications on the colors and shading on the map, and this was done by a member of the <br />Planning Division. <br /> <br />Public Comment <br />Mayor Foust read comments by community member, Robert Hoffman, a long-time community <br />member with extensive community involvement. He expressed support for the SO/50 <br />proposition and stated it was a win-win proposition. He stressed that the acres in controversy <br />would not make a large dent in what would be restored to the bay. <br /> <br />James Jonas, with time donated by Lynn Chou Jones, noted the report and the maps were <br />confusing. He stated the report was not trivial, but deep, and required in-depth reading to be <br />understood. He stated Docktown was affected as it was on the tidal plain. He noted he was <br />not for or against the initiative, per se, but that he would rather trust the Council's continued <br />processes and decision-making. <br /> <br />Glen Arvin raised concerns about the initiative and opined that a democracy goes with the <br />majority, while a two-thirds vote does not. He stated this was not necessary for the continued <br />trust in the City Council's process and in keeping with a majority rule. <br /> <br />Frank Bartaldo agreed the issue was confusing. He stated it allowed veto by a small group to <br />affect what the majority or Council might otherwise rule. On behalf of the business <br />community, he stated he trusted the intelligence of the elected and appointed officials to <br />make decisions and did not support the initiative. <br /> <br />Peggy Bruggman voiced support for the charter amendment. She directed her comments to <br />the staff report. She stated despite opposition, the report is clear on where the initiative is to <br />be applied. She did disagree with the report's discussion regarding the senior center and <br />where it fits in this initiative plan and language. <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING <br />MINUTES <br /> <br />MAY 19, 2008 <br />PAGE 7 <br />