My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2008-11-10 Clsd and Reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2008
>
AgdaPkt 2008-11-10 Clsd and Reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2008 4:43:09 PM
Creation date
11/6/2008 4:00:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
11/10/2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
219
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Juan Carlos Prado, President of the Gardener's Association, stated the association is in <br />support of the current process. He repeated the notion that while open space needs <br />securing, smart (green) developing and housing is also needed and can also be <br />accomplished. <br /> <br />Jim Bigelow, San Mateo County Chamber of Commerce, voiced his support of the prior <br />testimony and opposes the initiative. He stated the Association members had a chance to <br />read the report in depth, but there are still residents and businesses that have continued <br />questions regarding this initiative. He stated there are considerations that must be made <br />regarding open space and expressed concern over election costs. <br /> <br />Chris Davenport, on behalf of Trumark, stated they are in the planning stages with City staff <br />for their new vision for this area. He stated if the charter amendment passes, further <br />investments in the property will decrease and it may have a ripple effect throughout the city. <br />He cited long-term planning and financial concerns that might come with the charter <br />amendment. <br /> <br />Daniel Paley discussed the amendment proposal and pointed out several items that had <br />already been mentioned. He stated this is a great city with great potential. He stressed the <br />importance of letting the City Council continue doing its job. <br /> <br />Pat Dixon stated she gave her opinions in April and stands by the same views. She thanked <br />the City Attorney for answering questions, and asked for further clarification on the map <br />areas. She is uncomfortable with the petition workers, the two-thirds vote, and supports the <br />Council in its continued process. <br /> <br />Council Discussion <br />Mayor Foust thanked the speakers for their thoughtful and measured comments and looked <br />to Council for questions. <br /> <br />Council asked for clarification on Docktown, and also whether or not it was half the parks in <br />the city that were involved in the initiative plan. An analysis was requested on charter <br />changes versus the referendum process. A request was made for discussion of Council's <br />right to put something on the ballot if the initiative passed. Council asked (if the initiative <br />passes) who would pay for the legalities if a member of the community challenged the <br />initiative's validity. Council asked for clarification on the South Bayside System Authority <br />Treatment Plant (SBSA) property and the Redwood Shores Lagoons, and the area north of <br />the airport. Council also asked for clarification on the impact to the Docktown Marina. <br /> <br />Mayor Foust asked for clarification on the costs associated with the initiative and whether <br />Council could add something to the initiative in that the parties who initially backed it would <br />also cover any impact costs. <br /> <br />City Attorney Yamamoto stated they would be creating a transcription from this meeting and <br />would answer all questions posed. He stood by his feeling that his report and analysis are <br />clear but stated ambiguity arises when trying to apply the report's analysis. One Council <br />Member asked for clarification on whether the initiative would affect the housing obligations <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING <br />MINUTES <br /> <br />MAY 19,2008 <br />PAGE 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.