AgdaPkt 2008-11-24 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

something clear and understandable regarding zoning and other technical issues in order for people to understand what they are voting on. Vice Mayor Howard asked the City Attorney to clarify that Council was legally bound to put this on the. The City Attorney confirmed that there was no option to pull the initiative that it would go up for a vote, and the only variable left was when that would be. He stated there were three upcoming ballot choices to include the November '08 ballot, the spring '09 ballot or the November '09 ballot, and that it must go on one of these three dates. With respect to a City-sponsored measure, he stated that is up to the Council when this goes before the voters and what its content might be. The Mayor noted the emotional tone of the meeting, the struggle Council is undergoing and the respect Council has for the Redwood City Community as it continues to act accordingly in the best interests of its residents. Council asked if there could be some countermeasure or directive for a vote regarding the Cargill site, zoning etc., and if this passed with a greater number than the proposed initiative, would it supersede the initiative and prevent the unintended consequences. The City Attorney stated if this is what Council desired, such could be drawn up, and then vote would be made between the countermeasures and the proposed initiative, with the public deciding which was better. Council reiterated its optimism going into the meeting at hand, their frustration and loss of optimism as the negative comments towards the Council's activities mounted, and stressed that it would not be pushed to craft any kind of legislation on the fly. Council offered to understand the initiative and stated its desire to work with the proponents on achieving a favorable outcome. Council stressed that continued negative comments as to Council's abilities and/or reasoning would not serve any purpose. Council noted that any efforts to continue talks on the initiate were not stalling tactics by any means; in that time was being duly spent understanding the initiative and doing what was best for the community. Council again suggested the drafting of a countermeasure and also urged members of the community, proponents and/or not, to come together in discussing the future of the Bay lands since development and change of these lands over time was inevitable. Mayor Foust called for a ten-minute break at 8:45 p.m. Council resumed at 8:55 p.m. One Council Member suggested the need for a subcommittee on this issue. Council concurred that there were a number of unintended consequences and again stressed that in order to reach an equitable end result, all parties needed to compromise. Council stated again its philosophical problems with the two-thirds voting process. Council believed in this regard that they had no clear choice but to put a competing initiative on the ballot, hopefully one more clearly understood and with fewer unintended consequences. JOINT CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD MEETING MINUTES JULY 7,2008 PAGE 8