Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7A <br />Page 2 <br />Membership in the cities' committees varies greatly, with most consisting entirely or <br />predominantly of community members, and some including City staff or Council <br />members. Some committees meet monthly, others 6-10 times per year, some quarterly, <br />and some as needed. <br /> <br />Redwood City is already implementing and enhancing alternative means of <br />transportation, reducing traffic congestion, and ensuring safe and equal access and <br />mobility for everyone, both drivers and non-drivers alike. The City is in the midst of <br />updating its blueprint for the. future, the New General Plan, including the Circulation <br />Element that addresses issues of mobility with a focus on balancing the needs of <br />pedestrians, recreational and commute bicyclists, mass transit users, and automobile <br />drivers. Redwood City is planning for additional pedestrian and bicycle access, and has <br />already implemented enhanced mobility in some areas. This aligns well with new <br />California legislation requiring cities and counties to include Complete Streets policies <br />as part of their general plans. Complete Streets are roadways designed and operated <br />to enable safe, attractive, and comfortable access and travel for all users, including <br />pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and transit users of all ages and abilities. <br /> <br />The City is actively expanding its network of bicycle paths and lanes, with recent bike <br />lane striping projects completed in Redwood Shores, the Centennial Neighborhood, and <br />Middlefield Road. With considerable input from the Working Group and the community, <br />Redwood City is creating a map of proposed bike lanes and paths as part of its New <br />General Plan process. Redwood City is also pursuing more grant funding to support <br />pedestrian and bicycle projects, and an advisory committee could assist with this work. <br /> <br />The study team evaluated and discussed several options for committee scope, duties, <br />and format, and ultimately determined that the appropriate focus for a new committee is <br />a broader r'Complete Streets" perspective rather than limiting the scope to bicycle and <br />pedestrian issues. Any discussion pertaining to bike or pedestrian improvements leads <br />naturally to a consideration of the needs of an users of the roadways, including <br />motorists and transit users. The two options, rlBike and Ped" and "Complete Streets", <br />were discussed with both City staff and with members of the Working Group. The <br />consensus is that a "Complete Streets" Advisory Committee is needed. To ensure that <br />a Complete Streets Advisory Committee remains focused on the needs of bicyclists and <br />pedestrians, and that it does not shift toward an emphasis on automobiles and <br />motorists, the description of the committee's scope includes the words Uwith an <br />emphasis on traditionally under-represented users." There is a future critical need to <br />create less auto-dependent transportation options. <br /> <br />Intent: <br /> <br />An advisory committee can assist the City in meeting its ongoing mobility goals and <br />objectives, since such projects will require several years and continued focus. <br />Committee members who are the daily users of the City's streets and sidewalks provide <br />the additional perspective of what works well and what is needed, and can offer <br />pertinent information such as preferred connections to existing or planned routes, to <br />assist staff in identifying strategic opportunities. In this way an advisory committee can <br />provide added value. <br />