Laserfiche WebLink
<br />6.1C <br /> <br />For purposes of determining the maximum income and monthly housing costs Page 3 <br />necessary to support the sales price of the affordable units: <br />Eligible Households for participation shall be households earning no more than 12001<> of <br />median who pay no more than 3001<> of their household income for housing costs. For <br />example: <br /> <br />Moderate Household income for two people at 1200/0 of median income is $90,600. The <br />maximum this household can pay for housing costs is 300/0 of their household income. <br />Income $90,600 <br />Maximum Housing Costs 300/0 <br />Available for housing costs $27,180 <br /> <br />Proposed Rental Limitations <br /> <br />At the January 12, 2009 meeting, the Council expressed concerns regarding the length <br />of time that the Project units would exist as rentals. In order to address this concern, <br />some council members proposed a period of years, while others suggested utilizing an <br />economic index to signal the return of favorable marketing conditions in order to prompt <br />the sale of the condominium units. <br /> <br />Unfortunately, the City does not have the authority or the leverage to compel the <br />Developer to agree to the time limit r~strictions because the Developer's development <br />rights have vested, and the relevant appeal periods have expired. Because the Final <br />Map has already been approved and the Developer has performed substantial work <br />pursuant to City issued grading and foundation permits, the Developer's development <br />rights have vested. <br /> <br />In addition, the imposition of the Time Limit Restrictions would be an unreasonable <br />restraint on the Developer's property rights. Every person has the right to acquire and <br />use real property including the ability to rent their own property to others. <br /> <br />However, if the Developer voluntarily agrees to the Time Limit Restrictions, then the City <br />may want to consider memorializing these restrictions in a separate agreement which is <br />recorded against the Property. This approach would protect the integrity of the <br />Affordability Restrictions in the event of a challenge to the Time Limit Restrictions. <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />Do not approve the Declaration of Rental Affordability Covenants for 885 Woodside <br />Road Housing Project and the project construction will likely be stalled until the housing <br />market recovers. <br /> <br />Do not approve the Declaration of Ownership Affordability Covenants and the 6 units in <br />question will ultimately be sold at market rate. Without a regulatory agreement, the <br />project would not support the City's affordable housing requirements, nor guarantee that <br />the units remain affordable for 45 years. <br /> <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />Redwood City is not responsible for funding development of the affordable housing <br />project. The City may, however, decide to provid~ some form of homeownership <br />assistance to Qualified Eligible Buyers when the units are available for sale. Various <br />homebuyer assistance options may be provided to Council as part of the numerous <br />programs proposed in the City1s updated Housing Element. <br />