My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2009-02-09 reg
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2009
>
AgdaPkt 2009-02-09 reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2009 9:23:04 AM
Creation date
2/5/2009 3:07:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
2/9/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />8A <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />ANALYSIS OF 2009 RATE INCREASE <br />Allied's 2009 Operating expenses are expected to increase about 50k primarily due to 1) <br />labor-related costs (2.60/0) and 2) higher disposal fees at the transfer station (2.20/0). <br />Offsetting this 50/0 increase in projected operating costs are 1) 2008 revenues trending <br />3.1 % higher than expected (which will be the base for the 2009 revenues) and 2) 0.30/0 <br />available in the City's balance account due to prior year's revenues being slightly higher <br />than required. <br /> <br />PUBLIC NOTICE <br />In July 2006, the California Supreme Court determined that water consumption charges are <br />property-related charges and increases in such charges are subject to the procedural <br />provisions of Proposition 218. As a result of this decision, many public agencies are now <br />also following the procedural provisions of Proposition 218 for increasing solid waste rates <br />as there is some chance that the Court would also find that these charges are property- <br />related fees. Accordingly, staff followed the procedural provision of Proposition 218 and <br />mailed notices of this proposed rate increase to all addresses in Redwood City that receive <br />solid waste services advising subscribers and property owners of this recommended rate <br />increase. <br /> <br />Under certain provisions contained within Proposition 218, if a majority of the affected <br />property owners files a written protest against the proposed rate increase, the governing <br />body may not approve the proposed increase. <br /> <br />Since the deadline for submitting such written protests is 5:00 p.m. on Monday, February 9, <br />staff will advise the C.ouncil with the number of protests filed as part of the oral presentation <br />of this recommendation at the Council meeting. <br /> <br />Subsequent to the preparation and distribution of these notices staff was advised that a <br />recommended overall rate increase of 1.60/0 is required as opposed to the 2.20/0 increase <br />mentioned in the notice. Since this is less than the rate increase listed in the notice <br />adopting a 1.60/0 increase is permissible. <br /> <br />UTILITIES COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION <br />The Council Utilities Committee reviewed this matter at their October 8, 2008 and <br />December 10, 2008 meetings and recommends that this be brought before the full Council <br />for consideration. <br /> <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />Since the City, in accordance with the franchise agreement, does not pay Allied for the <br />collection of the City's solid waste, there will be no cost impact to the City if this rate <br />increase is approved. This practice is consistent for all SBWMA members. <br /> <br />~j~ <br /> <br />Brian Ponty <br />Director of Finance <br /> <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.