AgdaPkt 2021.02.22 Joint SA PFA - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

When Gary Redenbacher and I researched this and read every paper at the Port, we saw that the council and Port had observed this religiously for decades, and only asserted or claimed that one or the other entity had jurisdiction over very specifically delineated public trust lands if they had enacted ordinances and resolutions both sending and confirming receipt of the transfer or jurisdiction. This was diligent and responsible and in conformity with the Charter, which may only be amended by the people in a vote. The very simple inquiry here at all times, is whether the giving over in 1964 and giving back in 1970, put the portion of Redwood Creek in which Docktown resides, as in the Port or the council. This was before SLC was even brought in by Redwood City. They (the judge/RWC) made "me" sue the SLC instead of y'all intervening or them interpleading you, just another cowardly move of theirs, and not your fault nor mine. This could have been resolved by a 5 day trial at most, confirming whether the Port or council, under the charter, ended up with portion of Redwood Creek on which Docktown sits. But n000000, the RWC Burke law firm and Hannig had to once again use gaslighting and shenanigans to assert this ridiculous argument that PRC Sec. 6009.1(c)(13) precludes the PEOPLE of the State of CA from adopting, in their local jurisdiction (whether City or county, as the case may be) a CHARTER that creates an independent Port Commission. This cynical and jaded and result -oriented chimera of an argument worked for an OSC and Judge Miram then did not adhere to it on Demurrer round 2 where he said this is a triable issue. If Judge Miram felt his OSC had ruled on this issue, jurisdiction was irrelevant and all I had to do was allege concerted action (collusion). Not corruption, nor fraud, all of which the court got wrong. In any event, what has occurred, because of Mr. Hannig and the Redwood City City Attorney and Council and their outside Burke law firm, is that Redwood City now has a constitutional crisis, and an argument was asserted and approved by the 1DCA that, if applied statewide, or in another jurisdiction at any time, by another Superior Court or DCA that is being result orientered, is a disaster for CA ports. Notably, Oakland appears to have modeled its charter on Redwood City, at least the one it adopted in the 80s. It uses almost all of the same verbiage and provisions. Look at SF and Oakland and every other Port and see what is intended, and what is the result, of independent Ports. I will be seeking the support of every state assembly member and senator