Laserfiche WebLink
<br />6.1 E <br />Page 1 <br /> <br />REPORT <br /> <br />To the Hono:ra.ble: Mayor. ~nd.. q;ity,Ooun:cU <br />F ..Jj C". M. <br />'.-f...Q....m...... t ...e.' '.:1.. : .a.....a..'...e...'r.. <br />.'. .. .. ...... I'- <br />_ .. ...,: .....:... ...:....._.: ..: ...:..:..:. . ...:....::....,n..... . .....'..: <br /> <br />February 23, 2009 <br /> <br />SUBJECT <br />Water Supply Assessment for the Proposed Stanford in Redwood City Project <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Approve by motion a continuance of the matter to the regularly scheduled City Council <br />meeting on March 9, 2009. <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br />In 2001, the California Legislature enacted two laws - SB 610 (Costa) and SB 221 <br />(Kuehl) - each designed to achieve greater coordination during the land use planning <br />process between water suppliers and local land use agencies when considering certain <br />large-scale development projects. <br /> <br />SB 610 requires preparation of a Water Supply Assessment ~SA) for any <br />development whose approval is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act <br />(CEQA) and which meets the definition of (lproject" in Water Code Section 10910 (g)(1), <br />(2) - Le., residential development projects of more than 500 dwelling units or other <br />types of developments (e.g., hotels and motels, commercial buildings, industrial parks, <br />etc.) using a comparable amount of water. <br /> <br />The WSA must describe the proposed project's water demand over a 20-year period, <br />identify the sources of water available to meet that demand. and include an assessment <br />of whether or not those water supplies are, or will be, sufficient to meet the demand for <br />water associated with the proposed project, in addition to the demand of existing <br />customers and other planned future development. <br /> <br />Both SB 610 and S8 221 were drafted on the assumption that the land use planning <br />agency (Le., the city or county) is not the water supplier for the proposed project The <br />statutes thus identify distinct duties on the city/county and on the water supplier - which <br />is assumed to be an entirely separate agency. In the case of Redwood City, this <br />assumption is not applicable since the City performs both roles. However, the statute's <br />terminology, while awkward, can be adapted to the City's situation relatively easily. <br /> <br />The "City," as that term is used in the statute, means the components of city <br />govemment that have responsibilities for the land use decision process. At the staff <br />level, in Redwood City this is the Community Development Services Department, <br />Planning and Redevelopment Division. <br /> <br />The "water supplier," for 58 610 purposes, can be understood to mean the Public <br />Works Services Department, which is responsible for the City's Water Enterprise Fund. <br />