Laserfiche WebLink
<br />8A <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />'Budget' Continued from Page 1... <br /> <br />Preliminary information indicates that the state budget package will not suspend Proposition 1A <br />protections for local property and sales tax, nor will it shift or borrow additional funds from <br />redevelopment agencies. Furthermore, it will preserve local public safety funds (COPS, juvenile <br />justice and booking fees), providing the same allocations as occurred in the 2008-09 budget. <br /> <br />Key elements of the budget package have been widely reported in the press. The $41.6 billion <br />package is designed to resolve the state's deficit problems for the current and upcoming fiscal <br />years. It consists of $15.8 billion in cuts, $14.3 billion in tax increases, $10.9 billion in <br />borrowing (lottery and revenue anticipation warrants). If California gets $10 billion in federal <br />stimulus money, cuts would drop by $1.2 billion, tax increases by $1.8 billion, and borrowing by <br />$5.5 billion. <br /> <br />This is not a pleasant state budget by any standard. The budget cuts are deep and painful, <br />particularly coming on top of deep cuts made in February 2008, and in the 2008-09 budget <br />adopted last September. Key cuts include $5 billion for K-12 education (less than Proposition 98 <br />requires); 10 percent for UC and CSU; 10 percent for the Corrections Department's medical <br />budget; and elimination of cost-of-Iiving increases for CALWorks and SSI'-SSP recipients. The <br />budget eliminates two paid holidays for state workers, and continues the Governor's policy of <br />requiring state workers to take two unpaid furlough days each month. (The final number of <br />furlough days is still subject to negotiation.) <br /> <br />The budget also eliminates funding for local public transit agencies. <br /> <br />New Revenues Tied to Budget Reform. The package includes tax increases that would be in <br />place for two years, and an additional one to three years if a state spending restriction measure is <br />approved on the ballot. These consist of a 1 cent on the dollar increase in sales tax; increasing <br />vehicle license fees from current 0.65 percent of vehicle value to 1.15 percent; and increasing <br />gasoline taxes by 12 cents a gallon with proceeds dedicated to paying off transportation bonds. A <br />new 2.5 percent surcharge on tax liability would be imposed on the income tax, increasing to 5 <br />percent if federal stimulus assistance to California is less than $10 billion. The package also <br />reduces tax credit for dependents from $309 to $99. <br /> <br />The package borrows tax revenues from Proposition 63 (tax on millionaires for mental health <br />services) and Proposition 10 (tobacco tax for early childhood education program championed by <br />then-actor Arnold Schwarzenegger). <br /> <br />Ultimately, Voters Have the Final Word. Voters would have to approve all the budget actions <br />that involve changes in programs established by voter-passed measures. These include <br />borrowing from the lottery, reducing school funding required by Prop. 98 and taking funds from <br />Prop. 10 and Prop. 63. Voters would also have to approve the proposed new spending cap. <br /> <br />The League will continue to gather information and a complete analysis and summary of the <br />budget will be released as the details become available. <br /> <br />'Recovery Act' Continued from Page 1... <br /> <br />Even before the Senate bill was approved t the White House met with Conference Committee <br />members to begin working out the differences between the Senate and House versions. Late <br />Wednesday it was announced that the Conference Committee had agreed to a $790 billion <br />recovery package. Final votes are expected to take place in the House today followed by the <br />Senate on Saturday. The President is expected to sign the bill on Monday. <br /> <br />Cities Need to be Working with Their Regional Transportation Agencies <br />The finallegistation includes $29 billion for improvements to roads and bridges. While the specific <br />breakdown of funding has not been announced, we do know that the funding will flow through <br />metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs)~ Cities and counties will not receive a direct <br />~ allocation. As such, it is very important that cities are working with their MPO to secure funding <br />from the regional share. <br /> <br />2 <br />