My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2009-03-09
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2009
>
AgdaPkt 2009-03-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2009 12:19:59 PM
Creation date
3/5/2009 3:57:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
3/9/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />8A <br />Page 15 <br /> <br />California cities received detailed information on the ARRA funding allocations and how to apply <br />for funds in the "City Funding Book" a publication produced by the League of California Cities last <br />week. This booklet, posted on the League Web site <br />lwww.cacities.oro/resource files/27711.2009ARRAReoort2.23.09.odf), contains information <br />specific to California. It will be updated by League staff as new information becomes available. <br /> <br />NLC will share examples on their Web site (www.nlc.ora) of what cities are doing with their <br />funding. The Webcast is available for viewing at the economic recovery Webcast event site on <br />www.nlctv.orQ/. Please see aRecent Events" and select the title "The Federal Recovery Package: <br />What's In It for Cities and How to Access the Resources." <br /> <br />You may also view the Webcast on the Federal Economic Stimulus section of the League's Web <br />site at www.cacities.ora/federalstimulus. <br /> <br />The next NLC Webcast on "Economic Recovery Implementation" is scheduled for 3 p.m. on <br />March 11. Please visit www.nlctv.ora for more information. <br /> <br />'Constitutional Convention' Continued from Page 1... <br /> <br />The summit was co-sponsored by the Center for Governmental Studies, Common Cause, The <br />Courage Campaign, The Greenlining Institute, Joint Venture: Silicon Valley Network, league of <br />Women Voters, Planning and Conservation League, New America Foundation, and the William <br />C. Velasquez Institute. The meeting drew 300 - 400 business leaders. government officials, <br />public interest groups and interested citizens. Many city officials were in attendance at the <br />summit, Including League First Vice President Ken Cooley, council member, Rancho Cordova. <br />Chris McKenzie, League of California Cities executive director, also attended. <br /> <br />Many ideas for constitutional changes were floated for preliminary consideration, including <br />switching to a unicameral (singl~house) Legislature, eliminating the required two-thirds vote to <br />pass a budget, changing the state initiative system, increasing the size of the legislature (thereby <br />reducing legislative districts), and revisiting term limits. All were discussed as possible solutions <br />to re~establish fiscal responsibility. accountability and effective representation. <br /> <br />In theory, delegates to a convention could agree to change anything in the constitution and put <br />their proposals on the statewide ballot. One of the key issues under discussion was whether any <br />measure that is presented to the voters to call for such a convention should limit the nature of the <br />Issues that could be raised at the convention. <br /> <br />While 14 states automatically ask voters every ten to 20 years whether to have a constitutional <br />convention or not, California has not engaged in such an effort since 1878 <br />(www.sos.ca.oov/archives/1879/1879 CC papers findina aid.pdf.) Under California's <br />constitution, a convention may not be called by citizen initiative; It requires two..thirds of the <br />Legislature to agree to put the question of whether to have a constitutional convention on the <br />ballot which can be approved by a majority of the voters. <br /> <br />Some have suggested that legislators would not support such a measure, since it shifts critical <br />decisions about budget rules away from the Legislature to the members of the convention. <br /> <br />Senator and guest speaker Mark DeSauJnier (D-Concord) told attendees that he is testing that <br />proposition, by his introduction of legislation calling for a convention. His SCR 3 proposes that <br />voters be asked at the next general election to support the Legislature's providing for a <br />constjtutional convention, to commence six months following voter approval of the measure. <br /> <br />In addition to questions about whether and how to call for a constitutional convention, summit <br />attendees were reminded that there are a number of other critical questions about the convention <br />that would require answers. These include how statewide delegates would be selected, the <br />period of time allotted for the convention. the issues and topics to be considered, and what rules <br />would govern the convention. SCR 3 is currently silent on all of these questions. <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.