Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY - None <br /> <br />Mayor Foust announced the upcoming Boards, Commissions and Committees (BCC) <br />vacancies. She invited the current BCC members to attend a "Meet and Greet" on March <br />16, 2009 at the City hall foyer. This will be followed by interviews. <br /> <br />Mayor Foust announced that the Redwood City Public Library received a five star rating <br />from the Library Journal Index of Public Library Service. It was the top rated library in <br />California and these are exciting news. She congratulated that Department. <br /> <br />6. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS AND CONSENT CALENDAR <br /> <br />MOTION: Waive reading of the Consent Calendar except the ordinances by title, <br />adopt the resolutions and the ordinances, and approve other items. <br /> <br />Nancy Radcliffe, on behalf of the Chamber of Commerce, invited the Council to an <br />upcoming event titled "Good Morning Redwood City" on April 1, 2009. She also <br />announced the State of the City Address stream is live and announced an upcoming High <br />Speed Rail meeting on Wednesday March 4, 2009. <br /> <br />Kevin Murray spoke about the sacrifices of those who fought in World War II. He said he <br />was a skipper and a harbor master at Redwood City. His proposal is to restore vessels <br />from the World War II era and provide public access to them. He proposed a partnership <br />with the City and submitted a document with revenue information (on file). <br /> <br />Emily Lehr-Anning is a program coordinator at the Youth Institute and she would like to <br />express her organizations' support for the non-smoking in Redwood City parks ordinance. <br /> <br />M/S Diane/Hartnett to approve the Consent Calendar excluding items 6.1 A and 6.1 B. <br />Mayor Foust read the titles of the items to be approved. Motion carries unanimously by <br />electronic vote with items 6.1A and 6.1 B excluded. <br /> <br />6.1 B - Item pulled for discussion <br /> <br />Council Member Hartnett said he had issues with the contract because the baseline was <br />unclear. He would prefer having the scope include both baselines. He shared concerns <br />with how to deal with the possibility of lost opportunities such as car sales and retail. He <br />also does not want the consultants making a judgment and issuing a recommendation. <br />He wants the facts and the data (presented in context) but no conclusions to be presented <br />he views that the Council's role. Vice Mayor Howard concurred with some of these <br />comments and so did Mayor Foust. City Manager Ingram said that the scope could be <br />modified. Council Member Pierce would like to know what would be the highest and best <br />uses and she would not like to not limit the opportunities. She agreed that she is <br />interested in analysis but not having conclusions drawn for the Council. Vice Mayor <br />Howard agreed with having big box studied, and that auto sales are not practical. She too <br />would not like to have conclusions be drawn for the Council. Council Member Bain <br />agreed with Council Member Hartnett to not study big box or auto. <br /> <br />REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES <br /> <br />FEBRUARY 23, 2009 <br />PAGE 2 <br />