My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2009-03-23
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2009
>
AgdaPkt 2009-03-23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2009 12:42:59 PM
Creation date
3/19/2009 2:47:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
3/23/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
280
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />6.3A <br />Page 1 <br /> <br />March 23, 2009 <br /> <br />SUBJECT <br />Amendment of Chapter 32 of the Municipal Code to exempt performers contracting with <br />the City or other non-profit organization from the business license fee <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Introduce an Ordinance amending Section 32 Taxation, Division 4, Exemptions and <br />Exclusions of the Redwood City Municipal Code to exempt performers contracting with <br />the City of Redwood City or other non-profit entity from the business license fee. <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br />Parks, Recreation and Community Services (PRCS) Department learned of the current <br />business license requirement for performers as staff began to set up contracts for the <br />many performers used for events in parks and in the Downtown. Staff in Revenue <br />Services (RS) informed us that under the current code, each band would be subject to a <br />base fee of $37, plus $25 for each performer. RS staff also indicated that there were no <br />bands among current licensees. PRCS staff then provided a list of performers <br />contracted during the 2008 Spring/Summer Series to RS staff, which estimated <br />uncollected revenue of $3,500 to $4,200 annually. <br /> <br />Insuring that all performers have a business license would add a considerable amount <br />of staff work to the contracting process and likely result in the cost being passed back to <br />the City or in a worst-case scenario a smaller universe of performers. A review of the <br />codes in neighboring cities did not find any instance that directly deals with this situation <br />with the exception of the City of San Jose, where entertainers performing for the City or <br />another non-profit group are exempt from the license requirement. This situation is <br />similar to that of recreation instructors and sports officials contracting with the City who <br />are exempt under Sec. 32.136 of the code. We approached the Council's Finance <br />Committee, on Monday, February 9, 2009. The Committee recommended that staff <br />bring back an amendment to the current ordinance, which exempts performers <br />contracting with the City or other non-profit agency from the business license <br />requirement. <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />The City Council could choose to deny the proposed exemption to the business license <br />fee or direct staff to return with an amendment that allows the City to retain some <br />portion of the potential business license fee. <br /> <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br /> <br />Approval of this ordinance may reduce the City's potential revenue by as much as <br />$3,500 to $4,200 annually. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.