My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2009-03-23
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2009
>
AgdaPkt 2009-03-23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2009 12:42:59 PM
Creation date
3/19/2009 2:47:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
3/23/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
280
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />6.1G <br />Page 15 <br /> <br />V. PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK <br /> <br />A. Project Initiation, Refinement, and Finalization of Data Needs <br /> <br />We propose to have an initial meeting with City staff to reaffirm the City's objectives for each <br />analysis, refine the study's approach and work plan. Shortly after the meeting, KMA will submit <br />a final list of the information that we will need from Stanford and the City in order to complete <br />the analyses. <br /> <br />B. Fiscal Impact Analysis 1 <br /> <br />Task 1: Define "Opportunity Cost" Project Concepts <br /> <br />General Plans are long-term, community based, land use planning tools that are not intended to <br />change with every new market condition; rather their purpose, in part, is to ensure that the long- <br />term needs of the community are met, including the community's need for a balanced land use <br />portfolio to help ensure its economic health over time. Land uses are, however, allowed to <br />change over time within the context of the underlying Zoning and General Plan designations. <br /> <br />The fiscal analysis will evaluate the impact or lost "opportunity costs" of the proposed project <br />against two baseline conditions: 1} the property's current fiscal condition; and 2) the site's past <br />use when it was fully occupied (Le. 537,000 square feet of fully occupied MidPoint Technology <br />Park R&D uses between years 2000-2001). <br /> <br />Two scenarios that would be used to evaluate lost "opportunity costs" for the site would include: <br />1) a combination of highest and best uses at full build out conditions that would be allowed <br />under the existing zoning/General Plan designation (i.e. 0.70 FAR or 1,067,500 square feet); <br />and 2) a combination of highest and best uses built out to a comparable size (1.0 FAR or <br />1,525,000 square feet) to that of the proposed Project. <br /> <br />In short, KMA will collaborate with City staff to define development concepts for the site that <br />would be: 1} permissible under existing zoning or consistent with the General Plan Update land <br />use alternatives; and 2) provide a corresponding fiscal and economic benefits analysis. The <br />impacts of these "opportunity cost" projects will be evaluated and compared with the impact <br />estimates for the proposed Stanford project. <br /> <br />Task 2: Prepare Cash Flow Projections of Annual General Fund Revenues <br /> <br />KMA will estimate the gross annual tax revenues and subvention revenues that are allocated to <br />the City's General Fund to be generated by: 1) the baseline conditions defined under Task 1 <br /> <br />1 Throughout this document, the term "impacts" refers only to fiscal and/or economic impacts, not <br />environmental impacts. Fiscal and economic impacts are not subject to the California Environmental <br />Quality Act (CEQA). <br /> <br />Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. <br />\\Sf-fs1\wp\99\99900\900b-851 to 9OO\900b-865 Rev 3.10.09.doc <br /> <br />Page 1 <br />January 2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.