My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agmt09 San Mateo, County of
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agreements
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
Agmt09 San Mateo, County of
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2013 12:49:33 PM
Creation date
4/1/2009 8:53:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Agreement
Contractor Name
County of San Mateo
PROJECT NAME
Property Tax Adminstration Fee
RMP File Number
304
Date
1/15/2009
MO Ref
12-078
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SECOND ADDENDUM TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN <br /> THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO AND THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY <br /> TO TOLL STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS FOR CLAIMS <br /> REGARDING PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATION FEES <br /> WHEREAS,the City of Redwood City(the"City") and the County of San Mateo (the <br /> "County") (collectively the"Parties")may become involved in litigation regarding the County's <br /> calculation of the property taac administration fee(the"PTAF") as related to the Triple Flip (Rev. <br /> &Tax Code § 97.68) and the Vehicle License Fee swap (Rev. &Tax Code § 97.70)that the <br /> County charges the City,pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation Code,beginning in the fiscal <br /> year 2004-05; <br /> WHEREAS,the City filed a claim with the County seeking a refund of the amount of <br /> PTAF that the City claims the County overcharged the City in the 2006-07 and 2007-08 fiscal <br /> years (the"2006-08 Claim"); <br /> WHEREAS,the Parties entered into a tolling agreement on February 18, 2009, a copy of <br /> which is attached hereto as Exhibit"A"(the"Tolling Agreement"); <br /> WHEREAS,the County denied the 2006-08 Claim on March 31, 2009; <br /> WHEREAS,the City filed a claim with the County seeking a refund of the amount of <br /> PTAF that the City claims the County overcharged the City in the 2008-09 fiscal year(the <br /> "2008-09 Claim"); <br /> WHEREAS,the County denied the 2008-09 Claim on December 15, 2009; <br /> WHEREAS,the County and the City agreed to an addendum to the Tolling Agreement, <br /> to bring the 2008-09 Claim within its scope, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit"B" <br /> (the"First Addendum"); <br /> WHEREAS,the City has now filed a Claim with the County seeking a refund of the <br /> amount of PTAF that the City claims the County overcharged the City in the 2009-10 fiscal year <br /> (the"2009-10 Claim"); , <br /> WHEREAS,the City and County are aware that other cities and counties in other areas <br /> of the State are involved, or may become involved, in litigation concerning the calculation of the <br /> PTAF; <br /> WHEREAS,the Parties desire to avoid litigation in order to allow for additional time to <br /> evaluate the law as it develops on this state-wide issue; <br /> WHEREAS, the Parties now wish to bring the 2009-2010 Claim within the scope of the <br /> Tolling Agreement; <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.