Laserfiche WebLink
������� <br /> FOURTH ADDENDUM TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN <br /> THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO AND THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY <br /> TO TOLL STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS FOR CLAIMS <br /> REGARDING PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATION FEES <br /> WHEREAS,the City of Redwood City(the"City") and the County of San Mateo (the <br /> "County") (collectively the "Parties") may become involved in litigation regarding the County's <br /> calculation of the property tax administration fee(the"PTAF") as related to the Triple Flip(Rev. <br /> &Tax Code § 97.68) and the Vehicle License Fee swap (Rev. &Tax Code § 97.70)that the <br /> County charges the City, pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation Code, beginning in the fiscal <br /> year 2004-05; <br /> WHEREAS,the City filed a claim with the County seeking a refund of the amount of <br /> PTAF that the City claims the County overcharged the City in the 2006-07 and 2007-08 fiscal <br /> years; <br /> WHEREAS,the Parties entered into a tolling agreement on February 18, 2009 (the <br /> "Tolling Agreement"); <br /> WHEREAS,the City subsequently filed clauns with the County seeking refunds of the <br /> amount of PTAF that the City claims the County overcharged the City in the 2008-09, <br /> 2009-10, and 2010-11 fiscal years, and the County denied these claims; <br /> WHEREAS,the County and the City agreed to and signed addenda to the Tolling <br /> Agreement that extended the Tolling Agreement to the City's claims for the 2008-09, 2009-10, <br /> and 2010-11 fiscal years and extended the expiration date of the Tolling Agreement to July 1, <br /> 2013. A copy of the Tolling Agreement and the addenda for the 2008-09, 2009-10, and 2011-12 <br /> fiscal years is attached hereto as E�ibit "A"; <br /> WHEREAS,the City filed a Claim with the County seeking a refund of the amount of <br /> PTAF that the City claims the County overcharged the City in the 2011-12 fiscal year(the <br /> "2011-12 Claim") and the County has rejected this claim; <br /> WHEREAS, the Parties are continuing to discuss a resolution of these claims, and in <br /> order to do so without resorting to litigation the Parties wish to bring the 2011-12 Claim within <br /> the scope of the Tolling Agreement and to extend the expiration date of the Tolling Agreement to <br /> December 31, 2013. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: <br /> 1. The Parties agree to toll the applicable statutes of limitations for either party to <br /> file a claim, complaint, or petition against the other with respect to the calculation of the PTAF <br /> for the 2011-12 fiscal year, including, but not limited to, the applicable statutes of limitations for <br /> the City to file a complaint or petition seeking a refund or reallocation to the City of the PTAF <br /> that the City contends the County overcharged the City for the 2011-12 fiscal year, which the <br /> City contends resulted in an under-allocation of property taxes to the City for the 2011-12 fiscal <br /> year. <br /> 1 <br /> ATTY/AGR/2013.103/FOURTH ADDENDUM PTAF <br />