My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agmt09 San Mateo, County of
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agreements
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
Agmt09 San Mateo, County of
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2013 12:49:33 PM
Creation date
4/1/2009 8:53:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Agreement
Contractor Name
County of San Mateo
PROJECT NAME
Property Tax Adminstration Fee
RMP File Number
304
Date
1/15/2009
MO Ref
12-078
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~TE <br />~L <br /> <br />(!~ry <br /> <br />FIRST ADDENDUM TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO <br />AND THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY TO TOLL STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS FOR <br />CLAIMS REGARDING PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATION FEES <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City of Redwood City (the "City") and the County of San Mateo (the <br />"County") (collectively the "Parties") may become involved in litigation regarding the County's <br />calculation of the property tax administration fee (the "PT AF") as related to the Triple Flip (Rev. <br />& Tax Code ~ 97.68) and the Vehicle License Fee swap (Rev. & Tax Code ~ 97.70) that the <br />County charges the City, pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation Code, beginning in the fiscal <br />year 2004-2005; <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City filed a claim with the County seeking a refund of the amount of <br />PT AF that the City claims the County overcharged the City in the 2006-2007 and 2007-2008 <br />fiscal years; <br /> <br />WHEREAS the County denied the claim and the Parties entered into a tolling agrJement, <br />on February 18, 2009, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" (the "Tolling <br />Agreement"); <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City has now submitted a claim with the County seeking a refund of the <br />amount of PT AF that the City claims the County overcharged the City in the 2008-2009 fiscal <br />year (the "2008-2009 Claim"); <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Parties now wish to bring the 2008-2009 claim within the scope of the <br />Tolling Agreement; <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />1. The Parties agree to toll the applicable statutes of limitations for either party to <br />file a claim, complaint, or petition against the other with respect to the calculation of the PT AF <br />for the 2008-2009 fiscal year, including, but not limited to, the applicable statutes of limitations <br />for the City to file a complaint or petition seeking a refund or reallocation to the City of the <br />PT AF that the City contends the County overcharged the City for the 2008-2009 fiscal year, <br />which the City contends resulted in an under-allocation of property taxes to the City for the <br />2008-2009 fiscal year. <br /> <br />2. The City and the County agree not to file any claims and not to initiate or <br />participate in litigation against each other related to the PT AF for the 2008-2009 fiscal year <br />while this agreement is in effect. <br /> <br />3. This agreement constitutes the entire understanding of the Parties with respect to <br />the tolling of the City's and the County's claims as set forth in Section 1 above, and correctly <br />states the rights, duties, and obligations of each Party as of the effective date of this agreement. <br />Any prior understandings, promises, negotiations, or representations between the parties not <br />expressly stated in this document are not binding. <br /> <br />4. Subsequent modifications of this agreement, including but not limited to the <br />extension or amendment of the agreement, shall not be valid or effective unless set forth in <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.