Laserfiche WebLink
<br />88 <br />Page 59 <br /> <br />General Comments <br /> <br />HBC has selected Van Dyk I Bollegraaf as a manufacturer of their single stream sort <br />system. HBC has a history operating Van Dyk I Bollegraaf sorting systems and has <br />confidence in the manufacturer's ability to perform as specified. Bollegraaf is a Dutch <br />company that builds processing systems and balers, screens, and optical sorting <br />equipment. Van Dyk is the manufacturer's representative for Bollegraaf in the United <br />States. Van Dyk I Bollegraaf are leaders in single stream technology and are largely <br />responsible for bringing single stream sorting technology from Europe to the United <br />States. <br /> <br />HBC has recently completed several projects with Van Dyk I Bollegraaf. The Evaluation <br />team visited two systems in Arizona that were installed in the last two years. The North <br />Gateway facility in Phoenix Arizona was built by the City of Phoenix, who subsequently <br />contracted with HBC for the operation of the facility. During the start-up of the system, <br />HBC worked closely with Van Dyk I Bollegraaf. The second project installation was a at <br />HBC's own single stream facility at River Recycling MRF which involved the installation <br />of three TiTech optical sorting units into an existing Machinex sorting system. One <br />optical unit separates PET and two units were installed on the paper lines to remove <br />containers and other contaminants from the fiber stream. The installations were <br />completed on schedule (less than one week) and have effectively and efficiently <br />improved the quality of all fiber grades and raised the volume of mixed rigid container <br />recovery . <br /> <br />System Desian <br /> <br />Van Dyk / Bollegraafs design incorporates extensive flexibility and redundancy to <br />ensure continuous operations, as well as applying the current standards in high-tech <br />optical sorting equipment throughout the system. The system, as originally proposed by <br />HBC, included ten optical sorting units and was the highest cost system of all seven <br />proposers. HBC asserted that the high container recovery specifications in the RFP <br />required a high level of automation. <br /> <br />In response to the SBWMATs concerns over system's costs, HBC has reduced the <br />optical count from ten (10) to eight (8) units in their revised proposal. HBC proposes the <br />installation of two (2) PaperSort CN 2000's, two (2) PaperSort CN 2800's, one (1) <br />PolySort 2000 MD, one (1) PolySort 2000 DV, one (1) PolySort 2800 MD, and one (1) <br />AutoSort MF 1400. Two of the units are applied to the recovery of containers from ONP, <br />two are dedicated to the recovery of containers from OMP, and four units are applied to <br />the recovery of all plastics from the container stream. They have also removed one <br />drum-feeder (infeed for the commercial material) and added the required dust <br />suppression and film plastic collection systems, and a scale equipped conveyor for the <br />transfer of residue to the transfer station. HBC states that the revised system retains the <br />ability to meet the SBWMA's production and product quality requirements. <br /> <br />In their revised proposal1 Van Dyk I Bollegraaf have significantly increased the size of <br />their fiber storage bunkers and container storage silos. As currently configured, the <br />system affords ample capacity for continuous operation of the plant during short periods <br />of maintenance or repair. For example, when the baler or baler wire tier fails, the large <br />storage capacity will allow the plant to continue in operation for severa! hours while <br />repairs are completed. <br /> <br />SBWMA . EC Report <br /> <br />Page <br />35 <br /> <br />1/15/2009 <br />