My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2009-04-20 spc
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2009
>
AgdaPkt 2009-04-20 spc
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2009 2:24:49 PM
Creation date
4/16/2009 2:24:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Special
Agency Type
City Council
Date
4/20/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />6A <br />Page 11 <br /> <br />for the MRF sorters, their new CBA rates would be input into FORM 3-G. This Form <br />would calculate the cost increase from the amounts quoted by the contractor in their <br />proposal. <br /> <br />Question #2: What happens if the CBA is NOT renegotiated by Allied before the <br />start of the new Contractor's initiation of service in 1/1/11, but is renegotiated <br />AFTER the initiation of new services and the costs increase because MRF Sorters <br />are included in the CBA? <br /> <br />Answer #2: If the CBA is not renegotiated until after the initiation of services (in 2011 or <br />thereafter), then the initial one-time rate adjustment would include an adjustment for <br />MRF Sorters using the procedure for non-represented direct labor employees. This <br />process adjusts the rate quoted by the contractor in their initial proposal using 80% of <br />the changes in the U.S. Department of labor, Bureau of labor Statistics, Private <br />Industry Employment Cost Index series no. CIU2030000000000A. This step applies <br />because the initial one-time adjustment takes place in October 2010 to be effective <br />January 2011 and at that point the initial CBA is still in effect under this scenario. After <br />the CBA expires and a new CBA is agreed upon, the contractor would be entitled to an <br />adjustment in wages and benefits for all direct labor employees (represented or not) <br />based on the CPI only. So, if the MRF Sorters were not represented in the previous <br />CBA and a new CBA was agreed upon after 2011 that included MRF Sorter <br />representation, then the contractor would be entitled to MRF Sorter wage adjustment, <br />however, it would be based on CPI only and not on the wages agreed upon in the new <br />CBA. The starting MRF Sorter labor rate would be that which was established during <br />the initial one-time rate adjustment and subsequent adjustments using the non- <br />represented procedure. So it could be said that if the new CBA inCluded MRF Sorter <br />representation, the contractor would "eat" the difference between their MRF Sorter rate <br />as initially quoted and subsequent adjustments and the new CBA rate. <br /> <br />Question #3: What happens if the renegotiated CBA expires well into the term of <br />the NEW Contractor's operations term and is renegotiated by the NEW contractor <br />and the costs increase becau se there is a wage in creases that is negotiated into <br />the new CBA? <br /> <br />Answer #3: If/when the CBA expires well into the term of the new Agreement, the <br />contractor would be entitled to a rate adjustment for direct labor based on CPI only. <br />Likewise, it could be said that if the new CBA included MRF Sorter representation, the <br />contractor would "eat" the difference between their MRF Sorter rate as initially quoted <br />and subsequent adjustments and the new CBA rate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.