My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-01-06
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-01-06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 4:12:47 PM
Creation date
1/2/2003 3:23:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/6/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
lo. 2 <br />THE LEAGUE ANALYSIS: HOW THE GOVERNOR'S PROPOSED CUTS WILL IMPACT CITIES <br />The Transfer of Redevelopment Agency Low and Moderate Income Housing Funds <br />Governor Davis proposes to shift to the state general fund $500 million in Redevelopment Agency Low and Moderate <br />Income Housing Funds unencumbered as of December 1, 2002. <br />The League believes that the $5(10 million estimate of unencumbered assets is overstated. According to the State Control- <br />ler, in 2000-01, only $113 million was unencumbered, budgeted or otherwise designated for a specific project. <br />It is also important to note that it's not unusual for the housing funds balance in a redevelopment project to accumulate <br />over a period of years. The housing fund monies are not usually encumbered (contracted) until the end of the process of <br />funding a project. Agencies commonly need 3 — 5 years to assemble the funding sources, the project site and to secure land use <br />entitlements. During this 3 — 5 years, the accumulation of housing funds reserved or budgeted for a specific project is often <br />unavoidable. <br />As with many issues, the impacts of these proposed cuts are more complex than initially realized. At a time when the <br />housing crisis continues to grow, the loss of these funds could mean a loss of 10,000 - 15,000 affordable housing units. It is <br />unclear at this time to what degree Proposition 46 housing bond funds would makeup for this loss, but it is likely that any <br />compensation will be modest because of the types of affordable housing allocations specified by Prop. 46. Cities should <br />contact their local legislators and let them know how this proposed shift of monies will impact your ability to <br />complete projects, and to provide affordable housing in your community. <br />:) Mid -Year Transportation Cuts <br />Eliminate $90 Million for Local Streets & Roads Maintenance: For cities and counties the most immediate hardship in the <br />transportation cuts is the loss of $90 million budgeted in 2002 -03 for local streets and roads maintenance. Cities and counties <br />received their first quarterly payment from the Controller's office on October 11, 2002, but the Governor's proposal would <br />eliminate the remaining three quarterly payments (January, April, and July). As you may recall, although the entire shift of the <br />sales tax on gasoline from the State's General Fund adopted in 2000 by AB 2928 (and constitutionally protected by voters in <br />March 2002 as Proposition 42) was suspended for two years, the local streets and roads monies were held harmless in exchange <br />for receiving no rehabilitation and maintenance funding in the out years of 2006-07 and 2007-08. However, the Governor's <br />proposed cuts would immediately eliminate this fiscal year's funding estimated at a total of $90 million ($45 million each for <br />cities and counties). <br />Cities are urged to convey the impact to their city maintenance projects that these cuts represent. Legislators creed to know that <br />in some cases, due to both critical needs and "use or lose it" provisions, many projects have already started in anticipation of <br />receiving these funds. Telling these and other stories to your legislators can make a difference. <br />Proposition 42 Funding: The Governor also proposes to eliminate the transfer from the State's General Fund of the entire <br />Proposition 42 funding to transportation. This is estimated to save the Gene al Fund $1.046 billion in fiscal year 2003 -04. <br />Proposition 42 authorized such a suspension during a state fiscal crisis. Hovvever, Proposition 42 also requires a two-thirds vote of <br />the Legislature to institute the suspension. <br />For transportation the Governor's proposal means a further delay in the shift of sales tax on gasoline for transportation purposes. <br />This fund shift was to be allocated as follows: $678 million towards the Governor's 42 capital projects, $147 million for the State <br />Transportation Improvement Projects (STIP), $147 million for cities and counties for local streets and roads, and $74 million for <br />transit. <br />Continued on page 3 <br />PAGE 2/PRIORITY FOCUS Visit the League's Official Web Site••www.cacities.org <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.