My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2003-01-06
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2003
>
AgdaPkt 2003-01-06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2011 4:12:47 PM
Creation date
1/2/2003 3:23:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/6/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
M/S Howard /Ira to adjourn the Board of Eoualization Meetina. The motion passed <br />by a unanimous voice vote. The motion passed by a unanimous voice vote by <br />those present. <br />7:45 p.m. - Vice Mayor Ira left the dais due to a conflict of interest on Item 9.A. <br />JOINT ITEM - CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY <br />9. STAFF REPORT — CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY <br />A. Downtown Retail- Cinema Project; <br />Council Member Hartnett, Chair of the Retail /Cinema Project Committee, stated he is <br />proud and pleased to submit the report on the recommendations. The report included <br />in the agenda packet reflects the unanimous recommendation of the Council <br />subcommittee. <br />He explained the background indicating that Council approval of the Disposition and <br />Development Agreement (DDA) was approved in January of 2001. After that time, the <br />economy changed nationwide, but more dramatically, in Silicon Valley. As a result of <br />the economy it became apparent that alternatives needed to be explored in <br />connection with the Block 2 portion of the Retail /Cinema Project. Initially, Block 2 was <br />anticipated to have an office building of over 100,000 square feet and a parking <br />garage to service the office building and the Retail /Cinema complex along with other <br />parking needs. After it was apparent that Block 2 development was not feasible, a <br />substantial effort was made to explore what alternative uses might make sense in <br />order to generate similar value which would support the value. As that effort unfolded, <br />it became apparent that there were not alternative uses that appeared to provide the <br />same kind of support or that were consistent with the Downtown needs. It was then <br />decided to study what else might be done to promote a better Downtown. At this time, <br />there is an opportunity to reconfigure the project consistent with the goals set at the <br />beginning if the project. The amendment to the DDA still has within its confines the <br />Retail /Cinema complex as envisioned, but now has two stories of underground <br />parking below the Retail /Cinema complex, extending out to the street that will serve <br />the entire Downtown area. <br />Economic Development Coordinator Webb explained in greater detail the amendment <br />to the Disposition and Development Agreement and showed various slides to exhibit <br />the various points. <br />Council questions and comments ensued regarding the parking garage and parking <br />fees. <br />Public Comment: <br />REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL, BOARD OF DECEMBER 9, 2002 <br />EQUALIZATION AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES PAGE 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.