Res34 unnumbered 03 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

~jHEBEAS San Mateo County received from the State of Californi- for the fiscal year 1932-33, t?-s an alloc:iticn from State gasoline tax t m.o"tor vehicle opera tors,t and chauffeurs t fees and truck licenses, $210,605.61 for maintenaneeof roads, streets and highways within said ,County (other than State Highways), and WBEHEAS no defini te portion of said income for said. or any prior year has ever bee!}. allocated b~r the Board of Supervisors of San Ma teo County to the municipali ti es Viii thin said County, and contributions and allocations of funds to assist municipalities within said County in the maintenance of roads and streets within , said municipalities have been of ver~;riIlg amounts not exeeeding ten percent of such income of San Ma'teo County during the past ten WHEREAS eighty percent of tho population of San Mateo County years, and resides within the thirteen incorporated municipalities of said County and arproxima tely e igh ty })ercel1t of such gasoline taxes, license fees and truck licenses are pa id by the residents and tax- payers of said municipalitiesf and VvBEhEAS approximately fifty-six percent of road~, streets and highways (other than State lIighways) within ~3an lvlateo County are within said municipalities and forty-four percent of road.s and high ways are within the rural districts of said County, and ifHERE.AS the Ci ty Council of tlds City of Redwood City believes that a more equable ~ivision of such gasoline taxes, license fees and truck licenses should be allocated for expenditure for the maintenance of streets and roads within such municipalities in accordance Yvi th the plan heretofore adopted by the State Highway omrnission of California) to wit: upon the basis of population "ccording to the National Census of 1930) and