My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2009-05-18
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2009
>
AgdaPkt 2009-05-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2009 9:30:58 AM
Creation date
5/14/2009 4:02:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Special
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
5/18/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
349
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />b. Schools within % mile of the alignment (esp. during construction) <br /> <br />c. Motorists - in general (for detours, etc. - will require generic publicity) <br /> <br />78 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />d. Caltrain users <br /> <br />e. Bicyclists/pedestrians <br /> <br />4. Scope!types of outreach <br />a. Compilation/use of emaillist - regular updates <br /> <br />b. Periodic direct mail to all within % mile of alignment - frequent contact at milestones/key <br />events <br /> <br />,c. Advertising to support outre~ch at milestoneslkey events <br /> <br />d. Community workshops to provide overviews at periodic points in the <br />development/construction <br /> <br />e. Use of community focus groups to evaluate project design alternatives <br /> <br />f. Program/construction hot line for problems/issues <br /> <br />g. Information/education outreach elements to include: <br />i. Overall education on the basics of the HSR proposal, benefits and impacts <br />ii. Information on HSR grade and station options. what those options might look like, <br />comparing impacts and benefits. <br />iii. Schedule and phasing of tocal construction. <br />iv. Descriptions of construction activity, hours/daysltimes of construction, <br />visual/auditory/aesthetic construction impacts. <br />v, Traffic management'.plan, detours. construction worker designated parking, safety <br />for pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists, etc. <br />vi. Maintenance of Caltrain service during construction <br />vii. Potential station site and its likely impacts, both during Construction and once in- <br />service. <br />viii. Graphic representations of various alternatives, grades, station siting, etc. <br /> <br />h. Consider local task force for research/opinion/discussion of potential station site in <br />Redwood City , <br /> <br />i. Presentations to Boards and Commissions, Council <br /> <br />5, Questions for Council discussion <br />a. How to involve Boards and Commissions? <br /> <br />b. How are the possible HSR alternatives consistent with our vision for community, with the <br />Downtown Precise Plan. and the General Plan? <br /> <br />C. How to best utilize/allocate our own staff and consultant resources? <br /> <br />d. Depending on our allocation of resources, how might this affect Council's priority strategic <br />initiatives? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.