My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2009-05-18
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2009
>
AgdaPkt 2009-05-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2009 9:30:58 AM
Creation date
5/14/2009 4:02:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Special
Agency Type
City Council and Redevelopment Agency
Date
5/18/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
349
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />Attachment ~.1D <br />Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />Superior Court of San Mateo County <br />Han of Justice and Recordi <br />400 County Center <br />Redwood O~, ~ NJ63..1655. <br /> <br /> <br />(650) 599-1711 <br />PAX (650) 36S-4698 <br /> <br />I <br />MAR I 8 ZOOS <br /> <br /> <br />Mardl12, 2009 <br /> <br /> <br />CITY <br /> <br />City Council <br />City of Redwood City <br />101,. MtGdlafield Road <br />Redwood City, CA 94063 <br /> <br />k. Red Light Camera Increases Safety Report <br /> <br />Dear Counci1members: <br /> <br />The 2008-2009 Orand 1ury filed a report. on March 12, 2009 which contains findinp and r~s <br />pertaining to your agency. Your agency must submit eornmentsJ within 90 days, to the Hon. George A. Miram. <br />Your agency's response is duo no later than June JO. 2009. Please note that .he. respODse sbould tDdic:ate that it <br />wu approved by your lovemtoa bod)' at 8 pobllc meett.nl~ <br /> <br />For all findingS; your r~ondina agency shalt indicate one of the fonowing: <br /> <br />I. The respondent agrees with the finding. <br /> <br />2. The respondent disagrees whol:ly or partially with the fiDding. in which case the response shall specify <br />the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons therefore. <br /> <br />AdditionaUy, as to each Ot~d. Jury recommendation, your responding agency shall repOrt one of tbe fonowfng <br />actiobS{ <br /> <br />1. The recommendation has been impJemenl~ with a summary regardJng the implemented action. <br /> <br />2. The recommendation has not yet been bnplemented, but will be implemented in tbe future, with a <br />time frame for implomentation. <br /> <br />3. The recommendation requires ~r analysis. With an exp18D8tion and the scope and parameters of <br />an analysis or study, and a time frame for the matter to be prepared for discuss{on by the officer or <br />director of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of <br />the public aaency when applicable.. This time frame sball not exceed six months from the date of <br />publication of the Grand Jury report <br /> <br />4. The recommendation will not be. implemented beClause it is not wammted or reasonable, witb an <br />explanation. therefore. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.