AgdaPkt 2009-06-01 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

7A Record Corrections Page 5 Staff has discovered two errors in the April 21, 2009 staff report that bare mentioning and correcting: . Open Space Discussion - Page 3: The staff report states that "11,400 square feet is required for private usable open space or 7,600 square feet of common open space." The report should have stated that 11,400 square feet are required for common usable open space and 17,100 square feet are required for private usable open space. The project as presented to the Planning Commission conforms to the open space requirements and had been checked by staff. Unfortunately, during report drafting, staff made a calculation error and presented the information incorrectly. The open space discussion and calculation in Attachment 7 do not repeat this error. . Parking Analysis - Page 4: The staff report refers to the basis for a potential exception to the provision of guest parking spaces which was originally sought by the applicant. The report cited code section 30.2.1.E.1. This was the incorrect citation and it is not applicable to the Kentfield project. Staff provided correction during the April 21, 2009 hearing for the Planning Commission's consideration during their discussion about parking. The traffic impact analysis cites the correct section 30.2.1.E.2. Based on an evaluation of the project using the correct code section, staff recommended that the Planning Commission not grant the exception to the guest parking and suggested mitigation (guest parking provided in landscape reserve). The Planning Commission accepted the recommendation, but did not accept the mitigation and instead denied the request for an exception outright thereby requiring that all guest parking be provided on site. The parking discussion in this staff report and the traffic impact analysis should be the basis for the City Council's consideration of parking provisions. ALTERNATIVES . Uphold the appeal in part or in whole and thereby deny the project by not adopting the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, and/or the Planned Development Permit, and/or the Tentative Map. . Deny the appeal of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, thereby adopting it as presented. Deny the appeal of the Planned Development Permit and Tentative Map, but apply additional conditions of approval and/or require revisions to the project design which would need to be incorporated into the Planned Development Permit and the Tentative Map. . Depending on the Council's action, direct staff to amend the Zoning Ordinance for the R-2 Zoning District regarding density, or other requirements. FISCAL IMPACT No fiscal impacts are anticipated for the recommended action.